Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lavigne, 675 So. 2d 771.

44 citing documents.

  • State v. Holland 13 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ den., 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • Brooks v. SO. U. AND AGR. AND MECH. COLLEGE 877 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , ; State v. Hawkins, 90-1235 (La.App.
  • State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
    App. 4 Cir. 5/22/96), ; State v. Guillard, 98-0504 (La.App.
  • State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Cooper 830 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Lipscomb 823 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Lipscomb 807 So. 2d 218 La. 2002
    4th Cir.5/22/96), ("In the present case, Officer O'Neal ...
  • State v. Council 802 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ den., 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 792 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , ; *121 (La.App.
  • State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    App. 4 Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Furlow 780 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.05/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.01/10/97), .
  • State v. Handy 779 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    App. 4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Francois 778 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Echols 774 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Tassin 758 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Rice 758 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Lee 755 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 755 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 752 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Magee 749 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Tyler 749 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 1996), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; cert.
  • State v. Johnson 748 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Shields 743 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    App. 4 Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Littles 742 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Robinson 744 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4th Cir. *126 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 5/22/96) , , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), , a crack pipe was lawfully seized because it was immediately apparent to the officer that the object felt like a crack pipe based on the officer's sense of touch.
  • State v. Porter 740 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    App. 4 Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Jackson 733 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4th Cir.5/22/96), -80 , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Postell 735 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4th Cir. 5/22/96), , 779 writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Guillard 736 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    App. 4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ den., 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Willis 728 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    4th Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Nowak 727 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738.
  • State v. Traylor 723 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    4th Cir.5/22/96), , writ denied.
  • State v. Causey 721 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    4th Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Rose 708 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    App. 4 Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Schaefer 704 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Labostrie 702 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    App. 4th Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    App. 4 Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), , the court held that "introduction of statements *153 objected to as hearsay which are merely corroborative and cumulative of other testimony presented by the state is harmless error."
  • State v. Malmstrom 692 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    4th Cir. 5/22/96), , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), .
  • State v. Denis 691 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4th Cir. 5/22/96), -76 , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), , and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Hollis 688 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Jackson 684 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    4th Cir. 5/22/96), , the police officer testified at trial that during the search, he felt an object in the defendant’s right front pants pocket which, from prior experience, he suspected to be what is commonly called a “crack pipe.” As in Johnson , we found that his testimony indicated that the officer was aware, without further invest
  • State v. Gonzales 680 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    4th Cir. 5/22/96), -780 , this court stated: Generally, the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel is a matter more properly addressed in an application for post conviction relief filed in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing can be conducted.