Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Seals, 684 So. 2d 368.

214 citing documents.

State v. Thomas 159 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Duncan , 11-0563, p. 8, 91 So.3d at 511 ; State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995), it is undisputed that the reasons given for exercising a peremptory challenge need only be plausible.” State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 8 (La.11/25/96), (citation omitted).
State v. Griffin 167 So. 3d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 841A; See also, State v. Seals, 95-305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Magee 150 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(See also State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , rehearing denied, cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1199 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Lewis 147 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 841(A); State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 5 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
” The Photograph of the Door Mr. Cushenberry first argues that the court should have granted his motion for mistrial due to the state’s untimely production of the photograph of the door, which showed that it had been reinforced by the 2x4 and that the force of entry tore the doorjamb from the walls.
State v. Walter 144 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1199 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Leone 140 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Bibbins 140 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Edwards 133 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 14 (La.11/25/96), ; State v. Forest, 08-1474, p.1 (La.7/24/08), .
State v. Martin 131 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See also State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 5 (La.11/25/96), .
State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
“[S]pecific intent to kill may be inferred from a defendant’s act of pointing a gun and firing at a person.” State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), cert.
State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“[S]pecific intent to kill may be inferred from a defendant’s act of pointing a gun and firing at a person.” State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Morgan 119 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Pham 119 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Harris 105 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Duncan 91 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), ; Green, supra.
State v. Abdul 94 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Massey 97 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Strickland 91 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Seals, 95-305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Bridgewater, on rehearing, 2000-1529, p. 3, 823 So.2d at 910 ; State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), ; State v. Scott, 2009-0138, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Richards 78 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Seals, 95-0305 at p. 17 (La.11/25/96), (noting that “[djelay or no delay, the sentence the judge was required to impose would have been the same.”) Such is the case here.
State v. Trammell 78 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Seals, 1995-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Kerry Jerrod Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Sanders 74 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), (body language, lack of eye contact, and juror inattention are legitimate, race-neutral, demeanor-based reasons for striking a juror); (La.App.
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
3 Cir. 1/19/00); (citing Thom, 615 So.2d at 360 ; State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 10 (La.11/25/96); , reh’g denied, cert.
State v. Green 69 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Bishop 68 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Vincent 56 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
For example, the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , held that the failure of the trial court to observe the mandatory 24-hour rule was harmless where the sentence imposed was mandatory in nature.
State v. Patterson 63 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Kelly 46 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Turner 32 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
lain State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that specific intent to kill may be inferred from a defendant’s act of pointing a gun and firing at a person.
State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Shivers 998 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Reed 1 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Reed 1 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Lawson 1 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Distinguished State v. Hebert 991 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 17 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Johnson 981 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Jones 982 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Rick 977 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court distinguished that case because of the mandatory nature of the death sentence in the first, degree murder case, and the fact that no prejudice could be shown for the failure to wait twenty-four hours before sentencing.
State v. Williams 972 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Seals, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/25/96), , cert.
State v. Ross 973 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.