Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lavalais, 685 So. 2d 1048.

57 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Ray Donald Brister, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), State v. Lewis (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
    11/25/96), State v. Lewis, 539 So.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
    11/25/96), this court considered defendant’s argument regarding the state’s inconsistent positions during the penalty phase.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
  • State v. Tucker 170 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Such affirmative actions include making a clean breast through confession to the authorities as well as notification to the co-conspirators of abandonment or withdrawal.” State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , reh’g denied, 12/13/96, cert.
  • State v. Taylor 165 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), .
  • State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), (La.App.
  • State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Lilly 111 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Williams 93 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    In State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Martin P. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), (La.App.
  • State v. LeBlanc 76 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Aaron W. Ardoin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Ardoin 58 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The Defendant contends that Chief Du-puis’s statements and comments were more coercive than those found to be problematic in State v. Lavalais, 95-320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    basic fairness might require the trial court to permit the exposure of the inconsistent positions.’ ” State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Davis 30 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), .
  • State v. Marshall 6 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    Cf. State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), -57 , cert.
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Lavdlais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), .
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
  • State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
    This court has previously acknowledged that "`a situation in which the prosecutor has adopted such a fundamentally inconsistent position in the separate trials of two co-perpetrators that basic fairness might require the trial court to permit the exposure of the inconsistent positions.'" State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), ().
  • State v. Caston 912 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Mims 907 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , rehearing denied, 12/13/96, cert.
  • State v. Price 909 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    15:451; State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Butler 894 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), .
  • State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), .
  • State v. Bradley 858 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
    Cf. State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Pugh 831 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    15:451; State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
    Cf. State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 19 (La.11/25/96), ("If we were to hold, based on the small sampling of cases that we have, that the imposition of death is disproportionate simply because other juries recommended life in the preceding cases, we would forever preclude the possibility of imposing a death sentence in a murder for hire case.").
  • State v. Loper 807 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Lavalais, 95-320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
    Cf. State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, pp. 59-61 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Blank 804 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [13] State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96)
  • State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
    Cf. State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 19 (La.11/25/96), (although juries in Louisiana have historically favored life to death for contract killings, death is not a disproportionate penalty for the offense).
  • Jerich v. New Orleans Saints 776 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), .
  • State v. Williams 776 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 p. 6 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , Watts, 735 So.2d at 870 .
  • State v. Milton 764 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 4 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Mitt 758 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    art. 703(D); State v. Lavalais, 95-320 (La.11/25/96), , cert denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 p. 6 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Taylor 740 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    art. 703(D); State v. Lavalais, 95-320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State in Interest of JM 743 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , certiorari denied, 522 U.S. 825 , 118 S.Ct.
  • State v. Simmons 738 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    art. 703(D); State v. Lavalais, 95-320 (La.11/25/96), , cert denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct.
  • State v. Watts 735 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
    In the third case, State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , the defendant, a black male, shot and killed his employer's wife.
  • State v. Pascual 735 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Hayes 726 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    15:451; State v. Lavalais, 95-0320 (La.11/25/96), , cert denied, Lavalais v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct.