Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lennon, 661 So. 2d 1047.

14 citing documents.

State v. Cook 981 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
4th *234 Cir.9/15/95), , writ denied, 95-3004 (La.3/22/96), , cert.
State v. Hollins 981 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
4th Cir.9/15/95), , writ denied, 95-3004 (La.3/22/96), , cert.
State v. Martin 911 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
4th Cir.9/15/95), , writ denied, 95-3004 (La.3/22/96), , certiorari denied, Lennon v. Louisiana, 519 U.S. 855 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Lindsey 786 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Holder 771 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/15/95); -1051 , writ denied, 95-3004 (La.3/22/96); , cert.
State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 9/15/95) , , writ denied, 95-3004 (La.3/22/96), , cert.
State v. Williams 688 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Ruiz 684 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 9/15/95), -51 , writ denied, 95-3004 (La.3/22/96), stated: "Where a sentencing court articulates the basis for the sentence, it would be a waste of judicial resources to vacate the sentence for failure to consider the old Guidelines and remand for resentencing under the new scheme which no longer requires co
State v. Cooper 678 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 9/15/95) , *69 , explained "[w]here a sentencing court articulates the basis for the sentence, it would be a waste of judicial resources to vacate the sentence for failure to consider the old Guidelines and remand for resentencing under the new scheme."
State v. Ward 670 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 9/15/95) , , the defendant was charged with three counts of aggravated burglary and three counts of armed robbery arising out of four separate and distinct incidents over a two month period.
State v. Washington 670 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 9/15/95) , , stated: Where a sentencing court articulates the basis for the sentence, it would be a waste of judicial resources to vacate the sentence for failure to consider the old Guidelines and remand for resentencing under the new scheme which no longer requires consideration of those Guidelines.
State v. Washington 670 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 9/15/95) , , stated: Where a sentencing court articulates the basis for the sentence, it would be a waste of judicial resources to vacate the sentence for failure to consider the old Guidelines and remand for resentencing under the new scheme which no longer requires consideration of those Guidelines.
State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
4th Cir. 9/15/95), , stated: Where a sentencing court articulates the basis for the sentence, it would be a waste of judicial resources to vacate the sentence for failure to consider the old Guidelines and remand for resentencing under the new scheme which no longer requires consideration of those Guidelines.
State v. Hilton 665 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4th Cir. 9/15/95), , the Louisiana Sentencing Guidelines have been repealed by Act No. 942, § 3, of 1995, effective August 15, 1995.