Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lewis, 687 So. 2d 1056.

19 citing documents.

State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , 1060, writ denied , 97-0328 (La.
State v. Patterson 241 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 1/10/97), , 1060.
State v. Molere 99 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 1/10/97) , ; and U.S. v. Atilus, 425 F.2d 816 (5th Cir.1970).
State v. Ruffin 82 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Tillman 74 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Adams 976 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Jones 975 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Lee 964 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Holmes 841 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Clark 828 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Juarbe 824 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Evans 801 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Dank 764 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 1/10/97) , , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Prater 762 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Sartain 746 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Harris 742 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Finch 730 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 1/10/97), , writ denied, 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), .
State v. Winn 705 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir.1/10/97), , writ denied 97-0328 (La.6/30/97), , this Court noted: Before evidence of other crimes is admitted as proof of intent, three prerequisites must be satisfied: (1) the prior acts must be similar; (2) there must be a real genuine contested issue of intent at trial; and (3) the probative value of the