Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 656 So. 2d 1070.

39 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Jeremy James Griner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 5/ 30/ 95), ( wherein the court found the failure to observe the sentencing delay was rendered harmless upon the defendant's original sentence being set aside in the multiple offender proceeding).
State v. Maize 223 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 05/30/95), .
State v. Kirsh 273 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5th Cir. 5/30/95), , 1075.
State v. Napoleon 119 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Massey 97 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/30/95), -1075 .
State of Louisiana v. Tommy Cloud La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 5/30/95); wherein the court stated: Only one count of a multi-count indictment/information can be used to enhance the penalty pursuant to La.R.S.
State v. Cloud 946 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 5/30/95) ; , wherein the court stated: Only one count of a multi-count indictment/information can be used to enhance the penalty pursuant to La.R.S.
State v. Davis 911 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , the defendant was convicted of four counts of intimidating a witness.
State v. Coleman 828 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Parker 812 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Morris 798 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5th Cir.5/30/95), ) [14] State v. Herrera, 98-677 (La.App.
State v. Charles 790 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5th Cir.5/30/95), -1075 .
State v. Sanders 784 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Fish 782 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir.5/30/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Jordan 774 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , ; (La.App.
State v. Davis 768 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Lucas 767 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Breaux 767 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. McGinnis 768 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
App. 5 Cir.5/30/95), , we addressed an identical situation where the trial court failed to observe the mandatory twenty-four hour delay between denying a motion for new trial and imposing the original sentence, as required by La.
State v. Cepriano 767 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Jolly 768 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Sam 761 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Snavely 759 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Bates 742 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/30/95), (La.App.
State v. Battie 735 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 5/30/95), -1075 .
State v. Jefferson 735 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hopson 735 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/30/95), -1075 .
State v. Post 729 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/30/95), -1075 .
State v. Freeman 727 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Reyes 726 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Stack 710 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , -1077 ; (La.
State v. Hopson 703 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
5th Cir. 5/30/95) -1075 .
State v. Boswell 689 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Dugas 683 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , the defendant had written threatening letters to potential witnesses in an extortion case against him.
State v. Mayweather 677 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Soileau 677 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
5 Cir. 5/30/95) ; , wherein the court stated: Only one count of a multi-count indictment/information can be used to enhance the penalty pursuant to La.R.S.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by