Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Langley, 813 So. 2d 356.

19 citing documents.

State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 14 (La.6/27/03), (citing State v. Langley, 95-1489, p. 14 (La.4/3/02), ).
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
State v. Langley, 1995-1489 (La.4/14/98), , opinion after remand, 1995-1489 (La.4/3/02), , State v. Langley, 2004-0269 (La.App.
State v. Langley 958 So. 2d 1160 La. 2007
State v. Langley, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/02), (" Langley I ").
State of Louisiana v. Ricky J. Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Langley 896 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Dooley 882 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
See State v. Clark, XXXX-XXXX (La.06/27/03), ; State v. Langley, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/03/02), .
State of Louisiana v. John R. Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Chesson 856 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
The defendant attempts to surmount this deficiency by adopting "all arguments, law, statements, facts, and statistics" presented in State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
State v. Langley, 95-1489, p. 14 n. 14 (La.4/3/02), , 366 n. 14.
State v. Fleming 846 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Johnson v. Puckett, 929 F.2d 1067 (5th Cir.1991) and State v. Langley, XXXX-XXXX, p. 23 (La.4/3/02), ( Langley III ), citing Castaneda v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 494 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Griffin 838 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
The motion was based on an argument that the indictment should have been quashed because the grand jury was selected in a racially or sexually discriminatory manner, citing State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.04/03/02), , and State v. Fleming, 2001-2799 (La.6/21/02), .
Robertson v. CADDO PARISH, LA. 833 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
See complete explanation in State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.04/03/02), .
State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
art. 913; State v. Langley, 95-1489, p. 2 n. 1 (La.4/3/02), , 359 n. 1.
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
art. 913; State v. Langley, 95-1489, p. 2 n. 1 (La.4/3/02), , 359 n. 1.
State v. Jacobs 823 So. 2d 942 La. 2002
Acts, No. 281, the case is remanded to the trial court for it to conduct a full evidentiary hearing on the issue of discrimination in the selection of grand jury forepersons in Jefferson Parish in light of this Court’s recent decision in State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Kennedy 823 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
ANALYSIS Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the applicable law to be applied when reviewing an equal protection challenge to grand jury selections in State v. Langley, supra, 95-1485 (La.4/3/02), , 2002 La.