Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Allen, 682 So. 2d 713.

94 citing documents.

State v. Brown 804 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , ; State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Richthofen 803 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Bailey, 97-302 (La.App.
State v. Daniels 803 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), , [ reh'g denied, (La.10/4/96) ]; State v. Bailey, 97-302 (La.App.
State v. Harris 800 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , ; State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Diaz 800 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of what constitutes an arrest.
State v. Briley 798 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Ledet 792 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Bailey, 97-302 (La.
State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), , rehearing denied, (La.10/4/96); State v. Bailey, 97-302 (La.App.
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), ; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Allen, 95-1754, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Lowery 781 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), , rehearing denied.
State v. Washington 778 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , , writ denied, 99-0914 (La.5/14/99), ; State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Allen, 95-1754, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Taylor 774 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), , 724 and cases cited therein.
State v. Kirk 773 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Allan, 95-1754, p. 6 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Broussard 769 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96); ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065 (La.App.
State v. Harris 765 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
In State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), , a juror was challenged for cause, because he and the murder victim knew each other for two years and drank beer together at a local club.
State v. Watson 763 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
App. 4 Cir. 3/3/99), , writ denied, 99-0914 (La.5/14/99), ; State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Smith 761 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In State v. Allen, 95-1754, p. 6 (La.9/5/96), , the Supreme Court stated: This court has considered this issue and determined that “it is the circumstances indicating the intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing' of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an a
State v. Dorsey 763 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Allen, 95-1754, p. 6 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Fortier 756 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
See also State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), (quoting Ford, supra ).
State v. Anderson 750 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Bailey, 97-302 (La.App.
State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
See State v. Allen, 95-1754, pp. 5-6 (La.9/5/96), -19 .
State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96)
State v. Smiley 729 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
See also State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
See also State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Chester 724 So. 2d 1276 La. 1999
See State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96)
State v. Traylor 723 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96)
Harrison v. State 721 So. 2d 458 La. 1998
State v. Koontz 722 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Rhodes 722 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), -23 , has stated: Therefore, when a defendant uses all of his peremptory challenges, a trial judge's erroneous ruling depriving him of one of his peremptory challenges constitutes a substantial violation of his constitutional and statutory rights, requiring reversal of the conviction and sentence.
State v. Causey 721 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Allen, 95-1754, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Robertson 721 So. 2d 1268 La. 1998
State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96); .
State v. Lee 715 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96)
State v. Amos 714 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Furthermore, State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96); , states: In distinguishing between an investigatory stop and an arrest, courts have considered numerous factors.
State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96); , 731 n. 2, , (La.1983); , *410 n. 2 (La.App.
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
State v. Allen, 95-1754, p. 10 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Miller 703 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
See also State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Williams, 95-1971 (La.App.
State v. Stan 703 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
9/5/96), ; State v. Williams, 95-1971 (La.App.
State v. Hill 700 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
See also State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Williams, 95-1971 (La.App.
State v. Fisher 692 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
In State v. Allen, 95-KA-1754, p. 5-6 (La.9/5/96), -719 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *717 La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Denis 691 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Allen, 95-1754, pp. 4-5 (La.9/5/96), ; see also State v. Lavigne, 95-0204, p. 5 (La.App.