Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sandifer, 679 So. 2d 1324.

79 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Ladarrius Hodge La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
9/5/96), State v. Blanchard, 99-3439 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Freddrica Joseph La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
9/5/96), the Court found that where the defendant was found sleeping in the driver’s seat of a car with a gun on the passenger seat and a gun on the floor, these guns were within his “immediate control.” See Blanchard, 776 So.2d at 1170 n. 9.6 6 By way of analogy, the Supreme Court has stated the “immediate contr
The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a … La. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Leonardo Mastascuso La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Michael Calvin Duhon -Aka- Michael C. Duhon -Aka- Michael Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 10 (La.9/5/96), -32 ().
State v. Becnel 220 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Butler 162 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 5 (La.9/5/96), ().
State v. Washington 168 So. 3d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Brown 184 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App.
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Magee, supra; see also State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 5 (La.9/5/96), (“[I]f the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also support a *866 conviction for another offense, the defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one of the two.” [Emphasis in original.]).
State v. Zeno 155 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
6 See State v. Sandifer, 96-2226 (La.9/5/95), .
State v. Richardson 142 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Williams, 98-1006, (La.App.
State ex rel. D.V. 144 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App.
State v. Wiggins 139 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Draughter, 130 So.3d at 866 at *8; see also State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), (a person to whom a statute may constitutionally be applied may not challenge that statute on the ground that it may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally to others, in other situations not before the court).
State v. Smith 144 So. 3d 867 La. 2014
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Draughter 130 So. 3d 855 La. 2013
See State v. Sandifer, 1995-2226, p. 12 (La.9/5/96); (person may not challenge statute on the ground that it may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally to others in other situations not before the court).
State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 13 (La.9/5/96), .
State ex rel. D.W. 125 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App.
State v. Gisclair 121 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Petitto 116 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Therefore, “if the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also support a conviction for another offense, the defendant can be placed in [^jeopardy for only one of the two.” State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), (emphasis in original).
State v. Davis 115 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 5 (La.9/5/96), (Emphasis in original).
State v. Richard 115 So. 3d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Cooks 108 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Double Jeopardy Clause clearly “prevents an offender from being convicted of both the underlying offense for a 14:95(E) violation and the 14:95(E) violation itself.” State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Drewery 108 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Double Jeopardy Clause clearly “prevents an offender from being convicted of both the underlying offense for a 14:95(E) violation and the 14:95(E) violation itself.” State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Fisher 105 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Taylor 103 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 591; State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Letell 103 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sandifer, 95-2267 (La.9/5/96), .
State ex rel. S.L. 94 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
9/5/96), ] the defendant was charged with possession of marijuana and cocaine and possession of a weapon while in possession of a controlled dangerous substance.
State v. Cooley 87 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In State v. Sandifer, supra, [95-2226 (La.9/5/96), ,] the defendant was charged with possession of marijuana and cocaine and possession of a weapon while in possession of a controlled dangerous substance.
State v. Hall 85 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
|4In State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), , the defendant was charged with possession of marijuana and cocaine and possession of a weapon while in possession of controlled dangerous substance.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
9/5/96), the court explained that “the Double Jeopardy Clause, under both the additional fact and the same evidence tests, prevents an offender from being convicted of both a felony murder and the underlying felony.
State in the Interest of S.C. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
9/5/96), the court explained: “[T]he Double Jeopardy Clause, under both the ‘additional fact’ and the ‘same evidence’ tests, prevents an offender from being convicted of both a felony murder and the underlying felony.
State Ex Rel. Scj 28 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 5 (La.9/5/96), , the court explained: "[T]he Double Jeopardy Clause, under both the `additional fact' and the `same evidence' tests, prevents an offender from being convicted of both a felony murder and the underlying felony.
State ex rel. S.C.J. 28 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 5 (La.9/5/96), , the court explained: “[T]he Double Jeopardy Clause, under both the ‘additional fact’ and the ‘same evidence’ tests, prevents an offender from being convicted of both a felony murder and the underlying felony.
State v. Collins 30 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 10 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Williams, 98-1006, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Redfearn 22 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
As noted by the Louisiana Supreme Court, “the Double Jeopardy Clause, under both the [Blockburger test] and the ‘same evidence’ test, prevents an offender from being convicted of both a felony murder and the underlying felony.” State v. Sandifer, 1995-2226 (La.9/05/96), .
State v. Sims 7 So. 3d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
The rationale which supports that rule is the same as that which prevents on offender from being convicted of both the underlying offense for a 14:95(E) violation and the 14:95(E) violation itself.” State v. Sandifer, 1995-2226 (La.09/05/96), .
State v. Sinegal 5 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, pp. 4-5 (La.9/5/96), -29 .
State of Louisiana v. Andris Sinegal, Jr. AKA Andrus Sinegal, AKA Andrus Senegal, AKA Andris Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, pp. 4-5 (La.9/5/96), -29.
State v. Jacks 978 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, pp. 4-5 (La.9/5/96), -29 .
State v. Dudley 984 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 5 (La.9/5/96), .
State of Louisiana v. John Thompson, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In State v. Sandifer, [95-2226 (La.9/5/96), ] supra, .
State v. Thompson 943 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In State v. Sandifer, [95-2226 (La.9/5/96), ] supra, .
State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 10 (La.9/5/96), ; Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703, 733 , 120 S.Ct.
State v. Clark 909 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
[14] State v. Sandifer, 95-2226, p. 10 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Lee, 03-901, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Shrader 881 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Barakat 877 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
In State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96), , the defendant was charged with possession of marijuana and cocaine; also, a bill of information was filed under La.
State v. Baptiste 875 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
In State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96) , the Louisiana Supreme Court extensively discussed double jeopardy in the context of a defendant being charged with and convicted of both possession of a firearm while in possession of narcotics, a violation of La.
State v. Manning 868 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.02/26/02), ; State v. Blanchard, 99-3439 (La.01/18/01), ; State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.09/05/96), .