Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sneed, 680 So. 2d 1237.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Troy Collins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 9/11/96), ).
State of Louisiana v. Marty Palmer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 4 Cir. 9/11/96) writ denied 96-2450 (La.
State v. Palmer 1 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 9/11/96) , writ denied 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), police officers acted upon information from an untested confidential informant.
State v. Lala 1 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 9/11/96), ; this court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person “is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense.” La.Code Crim.
State v. Clay 930 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 9/11/96) , , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , also supports defendant's position.
State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 9/11/96) , , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 9/11/96) , , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Smith-Holmes 815 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 9/11/96) , , in which this court found that the officers in that case did not have reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant simply because he was seen briefly visiting a residence under surveillance for drug activity.
State v. Fontaine 814 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 9/11/96) , , and argues that, like the officers in Sneed, the officers in the instant case stopped him simply because he briefly visited a residence that was under surveillance for drug activity, which did not rise to the level of reasonable suspicion.
State v. Brown 804 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , this Court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person "is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense."
State v. Harris 800 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , this court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by 13police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person “is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense.” La.Code Crim.
State v. Briley 798 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.
State v. Derouen 790 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , this Court discussed the standard for determining if officers have reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory stop: *91 An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person “is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense.” La.Code
State v. Washington 778 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , unit denied 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , this court discussed the standard for determining if officers have reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory stop: 14An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person “is committing, has commi
State v. Campbell 778 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , the officers received a tip from an untested confidential informant concerning drug sales from a certain address by a named individual who was not the defendant.
State v. Broussard 769 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/11/96) ; , writ den.
State v. Watson 763 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , this court discussed the standard for determining if officers have reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person "is committing, has commit
State v. Tyler 759 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , this Court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person “is committing, has committed, or is about to 14commit an offense.” La.Code Crim
State v. Williams 762 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , writ denied 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , we set forth the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person “is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense.” La.Code Crim.
State v. Fortier 756 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , this court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person "is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense."
State v. Smiley 729 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 9/11/96), ; writ denied 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , this court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person "is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense."
State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , this court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person "is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense."
State v. Harris 727 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , writ den.
State v. Sheehan 740 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4th Cir.9/11/96), , writ denied 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , this court considered application of that article: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person "is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense."
State v. Parker 723 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 9/11/96) , , writ denied, 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , the standard to support an investigatory stop was set forth as follows: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person “is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense.” La.Code Crim.
State v. Miller 703 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 9/11/96), ; writ denied 96-2450 (La.3/7/97), , where this Court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person “is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense.” La.Code C
State v. Stan 703 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4th Cir. 9/11/96), [2] , this Court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person "is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense."
State v. Hill 700 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 9/11/96), [5] , this Court described the standard to support an investigatory stop: An individual may be stopped and questioned by police if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person "is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense."
State v. Ratliff 700 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 9/11/96), , writ den.