Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hidalgo, 668 So. 2d 1188.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Charles Ross La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Byron Franklin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
App. 5 Cir. 1/17/96), we observed that a jury was perfectly capable of determining whether the act of a victim “would not have placed a reasonable person in fear of death or great bodily harm.” For the purposes of analyzing the court’s ruling, it is problematic that it is not clear what Mr. Courrege’s proposed area of expertise w
State of Louisiana Versus Lanard A. Lavigne La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Alcus A. Smith A.K.A. "Bug" A.K.A. "Bull" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Ed Raymond Veillon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 1/17/96), State v. Slang, 94-332 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Dave A. Turner La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 1/17/96), State v. Brooks, 94-1031 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Bonilla 186 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Lantibious A. Broussard AKA Lantipious A. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Williams 87 So. 3d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bauman 15 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Holmes 10 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lawson 1 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Gonzalez 975 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
App. 5 Cir. 1/17/96), -98 .
State v. London 973 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Hidalgo, 95-319, p. 9 (La.App, 5 Cir. 1/17/96), .
State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Nguyen 924 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Barbarin 900 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Brumfield 887 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Smith 844 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
[20] See, State v. Hidalgo, 95-319 (La.App.5 Cir.1/17/96), .
State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 1/17/96) , ; State v. Brooks, 94-1031 (La.App.
State v. Richard 807 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 1/17/96) , , the defendant was convicted of one count of manslaughter and two counts of attempted manslaughter.
State v. Walker 795 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Narcisse 791 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir.1/17/96), , defendant was arraigned on the original indictment which charged him with one count of first degree murder and two counts of attempted first degree murder.
State v. Hensley 781 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 1/17/96) , , this Court found that defendant's contention that two autopsy photographs were cumulative was not properly preserved for appeal when, at trial, defense counsel only objected on the grounds that the photographs were gruesome.
State v. Patterson 752 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. McKinney 749 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 1/17/96) , , a case cited by the State in its brief, this Court concluded that the defendant's act of firing a gun in the direction of victims who were running away from the scene supported a finding that the defendant had the specific intent to kill.
Crane v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. 743 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Alexander 720 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Allen 707 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Bailey 703 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Winfrey 703 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
5th Cir. 1/17/96), -1195 .
State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Mequet 680 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996