Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bradford, 676 So. 2d 1108.

281 citing documents.

  • State v. Modica 216 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Duncan 213 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 2 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Martin 213 So. 3d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 1 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Norris 207 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , defendant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Davis 206 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    6/25/96), -11 , 1 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Smith 206 So. 3d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 6 appointed appellate counsel filed a brief asserting that he thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and could not identify any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Stokes 205 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 1 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Harris 205 So. 3d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 2 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Joseph 205 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 1 asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and *1017 cannot find any.
  • State v. Gardner 202 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 4 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has made a conscientious and thorough review of the entire appellate record, including the procedural history and facts, and has not found any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Emilien 197 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and.
  • State v. Nicholas 196 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    His appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief in accordance with the procedures adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, *868 95-929 (La.App, 5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 2 and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant.
  • State v. Durall 192 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 4 appointed appellate counsel' filed' a brief asserting that she thoroughly'reviewed the trial court record-and could not identify any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Durall 192 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 5 appointed appellate counsel filed a brief asserting that she thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and could not identify any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Faggard 184 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 2 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any n'on-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Chess 184 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 3 appointed appellate counsel has filed-a-brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Ussin 182 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) ; -11 , 3 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has made a conscientious and thorough review of the entire appellate record, including the procedural history and facts, and has not found any non-frivolous,.issues,to raise on appeal..
  • State v. Barnes 179 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    App. 5 Cir. 06/25/96), -11 , appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-Mvolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Barnes 179 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    App. 5 Cir. 06/25/96), -11 , appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly *876 reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Kent 178 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 2 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Woods 176 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , , 1110- *674 11, 2 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Rome 176 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) ; -11 , 6 .appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has made a conscientious and thorough review of the entire appellate -record, including the procedural history and -facts, 'and has not found any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Boudreaux 171 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Breaux 171 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 3 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Lee 171 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Stuart 171 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 1 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Wilt 170 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 170 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
  • State v. Respert 168 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal, following Anders v. California, supra, and State v. Jyles, supra.
  • State v. Alfaro 168 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 5 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Gayden 168 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 3 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Aguilar 167 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 2 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Britton 167 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 1 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Oliver 165 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 7 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Jaufre 164 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96); , 1110- *890 11, 3 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has made a conscientious and thorough review of the entire appellate record, including the procedural history and facts, and has not found any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Fontenette 164 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) ; -11 , 2 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that she has made' a conscientious and thorough review of the entire appellate record, including the procedural history and facts, and has not found any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Earwood 164 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), , 1110-ll, 1 appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Stockman 147 So. 3d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , -11 , 6 appointed appellate counsel filed a brief asserting that she thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Mendez 140 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Hoppens 140 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), -11 , 2 appointed appellate counsel has |4filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Goff 140 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gros 138 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    App. 5 Cir. 6/25/96), , appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asserting that he has thoroughly reviewed the trial court record and cannot find any non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal.
  • State v. Griffin 136 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Stewart 134 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Rivera 134 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Siggio 134 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Ricks 131 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Boutte 131 So. 3d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013