DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harris, 654 So. 2d 680.

38 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    It is also correct that “[a]dmissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.” State v. Harris, 95-900, p. 1 (La.5/19/95)
  • State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    It is also correct that “[a]dmissions of 18 identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.” State v. Harris, 95– 900, p. 1 (La.5/19/95)
  • State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    It is also correct that “[a]dmissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.” State v. Harris, 95– 900, p. 1 (La.5/19/95)
  • State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Bailey 152 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    In State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95), , following an adjudication as a multiple offender, the defendant applied for post-conviction relief, arguing that the trial court failed to advise him of his rights before he stipulated to his identity.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Justin James Badeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    This very issue was addressed by the supreme court in State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95)
  • State v. Moore 90 So. 3d 384 La. 2012
    This Court has “declined to adopt as a constitutional prerequisite to a valid admission of identity at a multiple offender proceeding a procedure analogous to the Boykin colloquy which must accompany a valid plea of guilty.” State v. Harris, 95-0900, p. 1 (La.5/19/95), ( n. 7 (La.1983) (“With deference to courts which have adopted an approach to the admission of identity at a recidivist or habitual offender proceeding which is analogous to that which requires a ‘Boykin’ examination prior to a gu
  • State of Louisiana v. Lionel Paul Dugas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    5/19/95), the supreme court held: Admissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS H. O. AKA J.O., AKA H.J.B, AKA H.J.O., AKA H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    5/19/95), because, unlike the affidavit introduced in Harris, “[n]o independent evidence or testimony was introduced to prove the defendant‟s identity.” Roberson, 664 So.2d at 690.
  • State of Louisiana v. Derrick Dewayne Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    In State v. Harris, 95-900, pp. 1-2 (La.5/19/95), the supreme court, reviewing the grant of an application for post-conviction relief, stated: Admissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege 2 against self-incrim
  • State v. Hart 66 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95), (per curiam), on application for post-conviction relief, the court of appeal reversed the petitioner’s adjudication and sentence as a multiple offender on the grounds that the trial court failed to advise him of his rights at the habitual offender hearing before defense counsel stipulated to petitioner’s identity.
  • State of Louisiana v. Arthur Bias, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Bias 63 So. 3d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    To determine whether this is an error that requires correction, we apply the harmless error analysis, promulgated by the supreme court in State v. Harris, 95-900 (La.5/19/95), .
  • State v. Boutte 27 So. 3d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    This very issue was addressed by the supreme court in State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95); .
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OTERREL J. BOUTTE AKA O'TERREL BOUTTE, AKA O'TERRELL BOUTTE, ETC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    This very issue was addressed by the supreme court in State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95)
  • State of Louisiana v. Carl Anthony Gobert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    5/19/95), the supreme court, reviewing the grant of an application for post-conviction relief, stated: Admissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  • State v. Gobert 24 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In State v. Harris, 95-900, pp. 1-2 (La.5/19/95), , the supreme court, reviewing the grant of an application for post-conviction relief, stated: Admissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  • State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
    State v. Harris, 95-900 (La.5/19/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Harris, 95-900 (La.5/19/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Thomas 2 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    More recently, the supreme court, in an application for post-conviction relief, stated: Admissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incriminat
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    More recently, the supreme court, in an application for post-conviction relief, stated: Admissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  • State v. Samuel 984 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    More recently, the supreme court, in an application for post-conviction relief, stated: Admissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Gonsoulin 886 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Admissions of identity at a multiple offender hearing implicate the defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  • State v. Roberson 809 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Harris, 95-900 (La.5/19/95); , the supreme court found the habitual offender hearing at issue was fundamentally fair even though the defendant was not informed of his rights.
  • State v. Kennon 781 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95), ; State v. Boswell, 96-801 (La.App.
  • State v. Musgrove 774 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    The three cases cited by the defendant must be considered in view of the supreme court's ruling in State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95), , where the court refused to reverse the guilty plea of a habitual offender whose attorney stipulated to his identity as the prior offender.
  • State v. Fletcher 776 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    This very issue was addressed by the supreme court in State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95); .
  • State v. Coleman 720 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    We note the supreme court's decision in State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95); , which found that the habitual offender hearing at issue was fundamentally fair even though the defendant was not informed of his rights.
  • State v. Boswell 689 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    However, we note the supreme court's decision in State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95), , which found that the habitual offender hearing at issue was fundamentally fair even though the defendant was not informed of his rights.
  • State v. Addison 684 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    State v. Harris, 95-0900 (La.5/19/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Payne 677 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    5/19/95); , which involved an application for post-conviction relief, also applied to cases on appeal and, if so, whether defendant's habitual offender hearing was fundamentally fair.
  • State v. Payne 665 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    5/19/95); , the supreme court, in reviewing an application for post-conviction relief, held that, in the absence of any allegation or showing that the admission was involuntary, the availability of post-conviction relief turns on whether the proceedings as a whole accorded the petitioner fundamental fairness and due process of
  • State v. Brown 665 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    5/19/95), a sworn affidavit was introduced in addition to the stipulation of prior felony convictions.
  • State v. Roberson 664 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995