Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ross, 669 So. 2d 384.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Michael Wallace La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Marvin Omar Villegas-Ardon La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Osiris L. Scott La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Orlando Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re State 240 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
State ex rel. W.B. 206 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3/8/96), the state asserted that because the defendant was not in a custodial environment the statements should be admissible because even if the defendant was in custody, spontaneous and voluntary comments were admissible.
State ex rel. S.L. 94 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Police officers are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as the statements do not result from police-initiated custodial interrogation or questioning “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.” State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96), .
State v. Gage 965 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96), , citing Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 302 , 100 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Jody" Duplichan, Jr. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Police are not obligated to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police-initiated custodial interrogation or questioning “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.” State v. Tilley, supra; State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.03/08/96), appeal after remand, 98-0283 (La.App.
State v. Duplichan 945 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Tilley, supra ; State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.03/08/96), , appeal after remand, 98-0283 (La.App.
State v. Reed 924 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1755, 1757 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979); State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96), .
State v. Shank 924 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
[18] State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96), .
State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Police officers are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police-initiated custodial interrogation or questioning “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.” State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96), .
State v. Williams 827 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Police are not obligated to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited | fistatements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police-initiated custodial interrogation or questioning “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.” State v. Tilley, supra; State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.03/08/96), , appeal after remand, 98-0283 (La.App.
State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
However, police are not obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements by someone in custody, as long as those statements do not result from police-initiated custodial interrogation or questioning “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.” State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96), (per curiam).
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
(Citing State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96), (per curiam)).
State v. Burmaster 710 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96); ; (La.App.
State v. Gaspard 709 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
The Louisiana Supreme Court recently noted in State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96); , that a waiver of Miranda rights may be explicit as well as implied from the actions and words of the accused.
State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
State v. Ross, 95-1798 (La.3/8/96), (per curiam).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by