Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Varnado, 675 So. 2d 268.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Eric James La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
5/31/96), (“In many cases, the nature of the crime may make it appropriate to assume that the fruits and instrumentalities of the offense are probably stored in the suspect’s residence.
State v. Donald 115 So. 3d 1138 La. 2013
The warrant thus established a “probable continuing nexus between the place sought to be searched and the property sought to be seized.” State v. Varnado, 95-3127, p. 2 (La.5/31/96), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); State v. Varnado, 95-3127 (La.5/31/96), : State v. Singleton, 98-387 (La.
State v. Lewis 33 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); State v. Varnado, 95-3127 (La.5/31/96), : State v. Singleton, 98-387 (La.App.
Explained State v. Long 884 So. 2d 1176 La. 2004
State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Varnado, 95-3127 (La.5/31/96), , the court elaborated on Leon and the application of the good faith exception as follows: *884 [T]he exclusionary rule “is designed to deter police misconduct rather than to punish the errors of judges and magistrates.” Leon, 468 U.S. at 916 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Profit 778 So. 2d 1127 La. 2001
We granted the state's application and now reverse the rulings below because in the present case, as in many cases, see, e.g., State v. Varnado, 95-3127, pp. 2-3 (5/31/96), , the police and issuing magistrate could reasonably assume that the fruits and instrumentalities of the offense were probably stored in the suspect's home.
State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
State v. Varnado, 95-3127, p. 2 (La.5/31/96), (-48 (La.
State v. Shortridge 750 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
By contrast, in State v. Varnado, 95-3127 (La.5/31/96), , the Court applied the good faith exception to a case where the affidavit for a search of a certain residence was found to be lacking in probable cause.
State v. Brown 750 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); State v. Varnado, 95-3127 (La.5/31/96), : State v. Singleton, 98-387 (La.
State v. Brooks 745 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Further, the police were entitled to rely in good faith on the search warrant | missued by the magistrate, under the general assumption that “an officer cannot be expected to question the magistrate’s probable-cause determination or his judgment that the form of the warrant is tech *135 nically sufficient.” State v. Varnado, 95-3127, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), , quoting United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 921 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Hoffpauir 731 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
By contrast, in State v. Varnado, 95-3127 (La.5/31/96), , the Court applied the good faith exception to a case where the affidavit for a search of a certain residence was found to be lacking in probable cause.
State v. Singleton 723 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Varnado, 95-3127 (La.5/31/96), recently addressed this issue.
State v. Andrews 703 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
See also State v. Varnado, 95-3127 (La.5/31/96), .