Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vale, 666 So. 2d 1070.

58 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 750 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Vale, 95-1230 (La.01/26/96), .
State v. Cayton 721 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Vale, 95-1230, p. 4 (La.1/26/96); (citations omitted).
State v. Butler 714 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
See, e.g., State v. Vale, 95-1230 (La.01/26/96), .
State v. Carvis Webb. State of Louisiana V. Dalmaus Jacobs. 704 So. 2d 240 La. 1997
See State v. Vale, 95-1230, p. 4, (“A witness’s bias or interest may arise from arrests or pending criminal charges, or the prospect of prosecution, even when he has made no agreements with the state regarding his conduct.”); (“[E]xposure of a witness’ motivation in testifying is a proper ri
State v. Vale 699 So. 2d 876 La. 1997
[*] Our prior opinion in State v. Vale, 95-0577 (La.1/26/96), , sets forth the circumstances under which we found that the trial court erred by precluding either relator or his co-defendant, Gayle Neidhardt, from cross examining Michael Bergeron, the state's principal witness, on his felony arrest and pending prosecution for carrying a concealed weapon in violation of La.R.S.
State v. Gay 697 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Defendant cites State v. Vale, 95-0577, and State v. Neidhardt, 95-1230 (La.01/26/96), , in support of his argument.
State v. Boswell 689 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
The State now concedes that the trial court's ruling constituted error, citing the case of State v. Vale, 95-1230 (La.1/26/96), , in support of its concession.
State v. Schexnayder 685 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
1/26/96), *369 , the Louisiana Supreme Court summarized as follows its jurisprudence on the defendant's right to cross-examine a witness as to bias or interest: ...