Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hopkins, 692 So. 2d 538.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. James D. Flemones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. John E. Gilcrease La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
App. 3 Cir. 3/5/97), (maximum 5- year sentence upheld where victim was beaten with a thick, tree branch); State v. McBride, 00-422 (La.
State v. Washington 274 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 3/5/97) , , the defendant received the maximum sentence *109 and was fined $ 2,000 after his conviction of second-degree battery.
State of Louisiana v. Gerrell Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 3/5/97), the defendant received the maximum sentence and was fined $2,000 after his conviction of second-degree battery.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Earl Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 3/5/97), the defendant struck the victim on the buttocks with a thick branch.
State v. Sanders 238 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 3/5/97) , , the defendant struck the victim on the buttocks with a thick branch.
State of Louisiana v. Dustin R. McGowan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. McGowan 258 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 3/5/97), , 541 ].
State of Louisiana v. Robert James Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Jacobs 74 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Jamie Francisco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/5/97), the defendant received the maximum sentence and was fined $2,000 after his conviction of second-degree battery.
State v. Francisco 55 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/5/97) , , the defendant received the maximum sentence and was fined $2,000 after his conviction of second-degree battery.
State of Louisiana v. Daryl W. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/5/97), -40, this court explained in pertinent part: Louisiana juries have the power to enter compromise verdicts, where the responsive verdict is legislatively authorized .
State v. Johnson. 21 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 *1164 Cir. 3/5/97), -40 , this court explained in pertinent part: Louisiana juries have the power to enter compromise verdicts, where the responsive verdict is legislatively authorized...
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/5/97), this court stated: Normally, courts impose maximum sentences upon the most serious violations of the described offense, and for the worst kind of offender.
State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 3 Cir. 3/5/97), , this court stated: Normally, courts impose maximum sentences upon the most serious violations of the described offense, and for the worst kind of offender.
State in the Interest of J. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/97), the defendant struck the victim multiple times across the buttocks with a thick branch.
State of Louisiana v. Dennis Charles Alfred La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/97), this court stated: The Legislature has provided criteria to aid a sentencing court in determining whether a sentence of imprisonment should be imposed and whether suspension of a sentence or probation is warranted.
State v. Alfred 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/97), , this court stated: The Legislature has provided criteria to aid a sentencing court in determining whether a sentence of imprisonment should be imposed and whether suspension of a sentence or probation is warranted.
State v. Lewis 892 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
3d Cir.3/5/97), ; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Jason La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/5/97), (citations omitted).
State v. Jason 879 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/5/97), (citations omitted).
State v. Brown 842 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 3/5/97), , 541: The Legislature has provided criteria to aid a sentencing court in determining whether a sentence of imprisonment should be imposed and whether suspension of a sentence or probation is warranted.
State v. Bingham 838 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Day 838 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 3/5/97), , we stated with respect to the issue of compliance with that article: The trial judge is given wide discretion in imposing a sentence, and a sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be deemed excessive lacking a manifest abuse of discretion.
State v. Jeselink 799 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
App. 3d Cir.3/5/97), ; (La.App.
State v. McClure 793 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
3d Cir.3/5/97), ; (La.App.
State v. Spencer 781 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Suire 775 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000