Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dinger v. Shea, 685 So. 2d 485.

26 citing documents.

Eric Antoine v. George K. Anding, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Little Capitol of Louisiana, Inc. v. Town of Henderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Little Capitol of Louisiana, Inc. v. Town of Henderson 128 So. 3d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Ralph Mayes v. Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Mayes v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. 104 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Raymond Alex, Sr. v. Bnsf Railway Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/11/96), -89, we set forth the standard of appellate review of summary judgments: Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court‟s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Alex v. BNSF Railway Co. 103 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/11/96), -89 , we set forth the standard of appellate review of summary judgments: Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
City of Alexandria v. Ratcliff Construction Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/11/96), -89, we set forth the standard of appellate review of summary judgments: Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court‟s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
City of Alexandria v. Ratcliffe Construction Co., LLC 95 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/11/96), -89 , we set forth the standard of appellate review of summary judgments: Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Jonathan Stelly v. Morrow, Morrow, Ryan, and Bassett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Stelly v. Morrow, Morrow, Ryan & Basset 62 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Gerald O. Bell v. Patrick Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 12/11/96), -89, we set forth the standard of appellate review of summary judgments: Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Michael Glass v. Lowe's Home Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Hill v. Coregis Ins. Co. 911 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , ; Sierra v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets Inc., supra .
Caddo-Bossier Parishes Port Commission v. Arch Chemicals, Inc. 830 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , , (La.App.
Rollins v. Allstate Insurance Co. 828 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 12/11/96); , 489 that: “Pursuant to La.Code Civ.P.
Thompson v. Harrington 746 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Bernard v. Chrysler Ins. Co. 734 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Daigrepont v. AAA Transp. Co. 736 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Rust Scaffold Rental & Erection, Inc. v. River City Joint Venture 709 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3d Cir. 12/11/96), ; Tybussek v. Wong, 96-1981 (La.App.
Pittman v. Nutmeg Insurance Co. 708 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 12/11/96) ; , this court has previously commented on the amendment, as follows: In other words, pursuant to the statute, summary judgment is now favored and should be applied liberally.
Stunkard v. Langlinais 708 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , , this court previously commented on the amendment, as follows: The new standard is equivalent to the federal courts’ view of the use of summary judgment.
Buras v. Lirette 704 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
3d Cir. 12/11/96), ; Tybussek v. Wong, 96-1981 (La.App.
Townley v. City of Iowa 702 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , this court has previously commented on the amendment, as follows: In other words, pursuant to the statute, summary judgment is now favored and should be applied liberally.
Berzas v. Oxy USA, Inc. 699 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
3d Cir. 12/11/96), ; Tybussek v. Wong, 96-1981 (La.App.
Jones v. Boustany 692 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997