DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Winn v. City of Alexandria, 685 So. 2d 281.

14 citing documents.

  • George Morgan v. Louisiana State Trooper Chad Richard 2564 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • Daphne Smith v. City Bank & Trust Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • Smith v. City Bank & Trust Co. 271 So. 3d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • R. Chadwick Edwards, Jr. v. Larose Scrap & Salvage, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 11/20/96), ), this court set forth the elements of a malicious prosecution claim: (1) the commencement or continuance of a criminal proceeding; (2) its legal causation by the present defendant against plaintiff, who was [the] defendant in the original .
  • Edwards v. Larose Scrap & Salvage, Inc. 89 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 11/20/96), ), this court set forth the elements of a malicious prosecution claim: (1) the commencement or continuance of a criminal proceeding; (2) its legal causation by the present defendant against plaintiff, who was [the] defendant in the original ...
  • Finnie v. LeBlanc 875 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 11/20/96), , sets forth the elements of a malicious prosecution claim: A civil action for malicious prosecution requires the concurrence of the following elements: (1) the commencement or continuance of a criminal proceeding; (2) its legal causation by the present defendant against plaintiff, who was defendant in the origin
  • JCM Construction Co. v. Orleans Parish School Board 871 So. 2d 1122 La. 2004
  • Gaynell Finnie, Indiv. v. Jerry Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 11/20/96), sets forth the elements of a malicious prosecution claim: A civil action for malicious prosecution requires the concurrence of the following elements: (1) the commencement or continuance of a criminal proceeding; (2) its legal cau
  • Hope v. City of Shreveport 862 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • Keppard v. AFC Enterprises, Inc. 802 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 11/20/96) , , (La.App.
  • Wiley v. Wiley 800 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • Gibson v. State 758 So. 2d 782 La. 2000
    3 Cir.1996), ; Miller, 511 So.2d at 451 .
  • Deville v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Dept. 762 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 11/20/96); , we stated the following: [W]hile an action for malicious prosecution may be brought where an individual is aggrieved by the consequences that flow from the governing authority's having obtained a facially valid arrest warrant, the same cannot be said of a claim for false arrest or imprisonment, even where a pea
  • Kelly v. West Cash & Carry Bldg. Materials 745 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 11/20/96); ; Tillman v. Holsum Bakeries, Inc., (La.App.