Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gallien v. Winn-Dixie, 685 So. 2d 531.

31 citing documents.

Brittany Price (Natural Mother) and Travis Merrill (Natural Father) Indiv and as Parents of Minor, Jameson Augustine Merrill … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Dee v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
R. Alan Kite v. Kite Bros. LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Doe v. Roman 19 Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Kite Bros. LLC v. R. Alan Kite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Doe v. Roman 19 Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Kite v. Kite Bros., LLC 170 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Kite Bros. LLC v. Kite Rv, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Kite Bros. LLC v. Kite RV, LLC 150 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Echelon, Inc. v. Joanna Cassidy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Nicol E. Hannie v. Ray Allen Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Hannie v. Guidry 48 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Carroll v. SELECT MOTOR COMPANY, INC. 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Darryrl C. Carroll, Sr. v. Select Motor Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Tee It Up Golf, L.L.C. v. Bayou State Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Tee It Up Golf, Inc. v. Bayou State Construction, L.L.C. 30 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Anthony Stevison v. Charles St. Dizier, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Stevison v. CHARLES ST. DIZIER, LTD. 9 So. 3d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Lillie Mae Middleton v. City of Natchitoches La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Middleton v. City of Natchitoches 954 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Adonis Raphael v. Geraldine Elizabeth Rapheal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Raphael v. Raphael 929 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Joseph Moraus v. Jennifer Frederick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 12/11/96), (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Moraus v. Frederick 916 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , (); Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.
Leonard v. James Indus. Constructors 879 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
LANE MEMORIAL HOSP v. Gay 873 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
[3] In support of its answer to the appeal, Gay cites, in her brief, (La.App.
Blane Devillier Trucking, Inc. v. Anthony J. Authement La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 12/11/96), Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Blane Devillier Trucking, Inc. v. Authement 858 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , , Doe v. Roman Catholic Church, 94-1476 (La.App.
Champagne v. STATE, LOUISIANA STATE UNIV. 819 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 12/11/96) , , which provides that workers' compensation claimants are entitled to increased attorney fees to reflect additional time and effort incurred in defending an employer's unsuccessful appeal.
Alexander v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 784 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
App. 3 Cir. 12/11/96); .
Perot v. Link Staffing Services 744 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Navarro v. Aries Marine Corp. 713 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 12/11/96) ; ; Broussard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 96-513 (La.App.
Navarro v. Aries Marine Corp. 713 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 12/11/96) ; ; Broussard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 96-513 (La.App.
Hawkins v. City of Jennings 709 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 12/11/96); , this court found as follows: If an appeal was taken solely for the purpose of delay or if it is evident that counsel for the appellant does not seriously advocate the position taken, then damages for frivolous appeal are appropriate.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by