Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. Dr. X, 679 So. 2d 1004.

17 citing documents.

  • Catherine McCoy Versus Dr. Fidel F. Sendra La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
  • Hollier v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 48 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • Baker v. Knapp 42 So. 3d 1044 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    3d Cir.8/28/96), (one and one-half years afforded plaintiff ample time in which to gather some evidence to support the allegations of her petition); Barron v. Webb, supra (summary judgment was not premature where plaintiff failed to take depositions of witnesses and submitted only conclusory affidavit in opposition to motion for summa
  • KAMPMANN v. Mason 42 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 8/28/96), , citing Hayes v. Travelers Ins.
  • Bozarth v. STATE LSU MEDICAL CENTER 35 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Guillory v. Dr. X, 96-85, p. 8 (La.App.3d 8/28/96), .
  • Baker v. Williams 825 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 8/28/96), (citing Schroeder v. Bd.
  • Weeks v. Brown 796 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 8/28/96), (citing Schroeder v. Bd.
  • Demopulos v. Jackson 765 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    3d Cir.08/28/96), (one and one-half years afforded plaintiff ample time in which to gather some evidence to support the allegations of her petition); (La.
  • American Central Ins. Co. v. Hilman 744 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    3d Cir.08/28/96), (one and one-half years afforded plaintiff ample time in which to gather some evidence to support the allegations of her petition); (La.
  • Simmons v. Berry 748 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 8/28/96) , ; (La.App.
  • Lee v. Wall 726 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    3d Cir.08/28/96), ; Venable v. Dr. X, 95-1634 (La.App.
  • Pugh v. Beach 722 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    3rd Cir. 8/28/96), ; (La.App.
  • Robertson v. Northshore Regional Medical Center 723 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3rd Cir.8/28/96), ; Venable v. Dr. X, 95-1634 (La.App.
  • Decker v. Kibler 731 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 8/28/96); (citing Schroeder v. Bd.
  • Morris v. Ghoniem 703 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    3d Cir. 8/28/96), , the defendants contend that presentation of the panel opinion is sufficient to shift the burden of production onto Mr. Morris.
  • Townley v. City of Iowa 702 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Powers v. Tucker 690 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    3d Cir. 8/28/96), , the Third Circuit again relied upon the Richoux case to affirm the granting of summary judgment.