Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Caulfield, 683 So. 2d 714.

336 citing documents.

In re Williams 842 So. 2d 353 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Brigandi 843 So. 2d 1083 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re LaGrone 843 So. 2d 1057 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In Re Blair 840 So. 2d 1191 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96 1401 (La.11/25/96), .
In Re Grevemberg 838 So. 2d 1283 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), .
In Re Bilbe 841 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Graham 841 So. 2d 707 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Hilburn 840 So. 2d 471 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Reynolds 840 So. 2d 477 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Crittenden 839 So. 2d 936 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Cohen 840 So. 2d 484 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re White 840 So. 2d 488 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Elbert 840 So. 2d 494 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Condoll 840 So. 2d 502 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Bonnette 840 So. 2d 512 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Laurent 835 So. 2d 430 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Alex 835 So. 2d 455 La. 2003
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In Re Hackman 833 So. 2d 916 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401, p. 4 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Casanova 847 So. 2d 1169 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Dunn 831 So. 2d 889 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Ali 829 So. 2d 1015 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Mathews 827 So. 2d 1129 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.1125/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Schambach 826 So. 2d 539 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Turnage 826 So. 2d 546 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Richard 826 So. 2d 542 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Smith 821 So. 2d 1286 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Dumas 819 So. 2d 313 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In Re Marinoff 819 So. 2d 305 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Henderson 819 So. 2d 296 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Dumaine 818 So. 2d 756 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In Re Faucheux 818 So. 2d 734 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Robinson 819 So. 2d 280 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In Re Barstow 817 So. 2d 1123 La. 2002
See In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Pardue, 93-2865 (La.3/11/94), .
In re Keele 783 So. 2d 1261 La. 2001
Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(G); In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), .
In Re Cudzik 738 So. 2d 1054 La. 1999
Citing this court's opinions in In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), , and In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), , the board found that a decision and findings of fact from a related civil proceeding are admissible in a disciplinary proceeding, although they are not controlling as to the findings of fact in the disciplinary proceeding.
Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 708 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
In re Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96); .