Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rivet v. State, Dept. of Trans. and Dev., 680 So. 2d 1154.

110 citing documents.

Dazet Mortgage Solutions LLC v. Faia 116 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and Development, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Provosty v. ARC Construction, LLC 119 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
& Development, 96-145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), -1162 , and provided extensive-reasons for not awarding the Plaintiffs the full amount they were requesting.
Spears v. Grambling State University 111 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Rivet v. State, Dept. of Trans, and Dev., 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Brecheen v. News Group, L.P. 105 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
and Dev., 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Monteleone 106 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
and Dev., 96-0145, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), -2 ; Williamson, supra.
Brandner v. Staf-Rath, L.L.C. 102 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
and Development, 96-0145, p. 10 (La.9/5/96), .
Sicard v. Sicard 82 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
and Dev., 96-145, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
Tommy McCain v. Joanna Cassidy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
McCain v. Cassidy 68 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
and Dev., 96-145, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
Lake Charles Memorial Hospital (Stephen Babin) v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
9/5/96), an inverse condemnation suit, the court was faced with three statutes that seemingly applied to the question of attorney fees; in its simplest form the question was whether the formulation should be based on “attorney fees actually incurred,” La.R.S.
Lake Charles Memorial Hospital v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. 108 So. 3d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Rivet v. State, 90-145 (La.9/5/96), , an inverse condemnation suit, the court was faced with three statutes that seemingly applied to the question of attorney fees; in its simplest form the question was whether the formulation should be based on “attorney fees actually incurred,” La.
In Reference to the Interdiction of Jones 54 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
and Development, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
South East Auto Dealers Rental Ass'n v. EZ Rent to Own, Inc. 42 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 12/5/07), , citing Rivet v. State 96-0145 (La.9/5/96) .
Stone Insurance, Inc. v. Beyer-Beeson Insurance Agency, Inc. 45 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
and Development, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), , to determine the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees due to Stone for prosecuting both the trial and the appeal of this matter.
Audubon Orthopedic & Sports Medicine, APMC v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 38 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Co, supra, 07-2441, p. 18, 988 So.2d at 201 (citing Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), ; ).
Willwoods Community v. Essex Insurance 33 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
and Dev., 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Ray v. Department of Labor 998 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
and Development 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), -62 .
Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 988 So. 2d 186 La. 2008
E.g., Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), ; State, (La.
Ellsworth Corp. v. PETE VICARI GENERAL CON. 977 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
and Development, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Joseph v. ENTERGY 972 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), ; Huddleston v. Bossier Bank & Trust Co.
Lamar Tate Hutchinson, Jr. v. Trussco, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hutchinson v. Trussco, Inc. 943 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
and Dev., 96-0145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), .
Latson v. Harvey 942 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.09/05/96), .
Robert Neil Guilbeau v. Bayou Chateau Nursing Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
and Dev., 96-0145, p. 11 (La.9/5/96)
Guilbeau v. Bayou Chateau Nursing Center 930 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
and Dev., 96-0145, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
Homer D. Wood v. Axis Energy Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
9/5/96), the supreme court set forth the factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) the amount of money involved; (5) the extent and character of the work per
Wood v. Axis Energy Corp. 899 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
and Dev., 96-145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), , the supreme court set forth the factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) the amount of money involved; (5) the extent and character of the work performed; (6) the leg
Smith v. State 899 So. 2d 516 La. 2005
and Dev., 96-0145, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
Wooley v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. 893 So. 2d 746 La. 2005
and Dev., 96-0145, p. 6 (La.9/5/96), .
In re the Succession of Horn 877 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
and Development, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Keaty v. Raspanti 866 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
and Dev., 96-0145, p. 12 (La.9/5/96), (listing "the court's own knowledge" as a proper factor to consider in determining the reasonableness of attorney's fees).
NEW ORLEANS REDEV. AUTH. v. Stroughter 861 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
and Dev., 96-0145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), ).
Avenal v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 858 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
In Rivet v. State, DOTD, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), , the trial court determined that the DOTD had taken a landowner's property, which he intended to develop as a residential subdivision, when it refused to grant him a driveway permit to allow ingress and egress to and from his property onto Airline Highway.
Prestridge v. Elliott 847 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
and Dev., 96-145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), , 1161: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) the amount of money involved; (5) the extent and character of the work performed; (6) the legal knowledge, attainment, and skill of the attorneys; (7) the number of appearances involved; (8) the intrica
Reed v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 832 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96); .
Buras v. Schultz 828 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
and Dev., 96-145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), .
Rivet v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 825 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
and Development, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Capital City Press v. Board of Supervisors 822 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Rivet v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 96-0145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), .
Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 821 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), ; Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson, & Curtis, Inc.
Vela v. Plaquemines Parish Government 811 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
13:5111 is Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), , in which the Supreme Court discussed the standard for appellate review of an award of attorney fees as follows: Regardless of the language of the statutory authorization for an award of attorney fees or the method employed by a trial court in making an award of attorney fees, courts may inquire as to the reasonablen
Labadie v. Physician Network Corp. of Louisiana, Inc. 805 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In Rivet v. State, Dept. of Trans, and Dev., 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), , the court set forth a number of factors to be considered in determining whether a fee is reasonable or not.
Rivet v. STATE, DOTD 800 So. 2d 777 La. 2001
Rivet v. State, Department of Transportation & Development, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Bd. 797 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
13:5111 and the instructions from Rivet v. State, Dept. of Transportation and Development, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), , when determining its award.
ST. TAMMANY PARISH HOSP. SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 2 v. Schneider 808 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
and Dev., 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Cliburn v. Police Jury Ass'n of Louisiana 770 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Rivet v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 96-0145, p. 10 (La.9/5/96), .
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. LeBlanc 763 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
and Dev., 96-0145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), .
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 763 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
and Dev., 96-1045, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96), -62 .
Voitier v. Church Point Wholesale Bev. Co., Inc. 760 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
and Dev., 96-C-145, pp. 11-12 (La.9/5/96); .
Calogero v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 753 So. 2d 170 La. 2000
[2] The court of appeal's award of $7,000 in attorney fees is an appropriate amount under the factors enunciated in Rivet v. State, DOTD, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), .
Custom-Bilt Cabinet v. Quality Built Cab. 748 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Maggio v. Robinson, 31,913 (La.App.2d Cir.5/5/99), ; Rivet v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 96-0145 (La.1996), .