Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Knapper v. Connick, 681 So. 2d 944.

31 citing documents.

Gabrielle C. Jameson And Kim L. Jameson Wife Of/and La. 2023
Ocean Jasmine Manning v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
10/15/96), “that state prosecuting attorneys are constitutional officers who serve in the judicial branch of the government.” In Foster v. Powdrill, 463 (La.App.
Dexter Johnson Versus Madeline Jasmine - Individual Capacity La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
10/15/96, 3), (citing Killeen v. Boland, Gschwind Co.,157 La.
Johnny Gauthier v. Jason Gerald Ard, in his capacity as Sheriff of Livingston Parish, Major Stan Carpenter, Deputy … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Stanley R. Palowsky, III, Individually, and on Behalf of Alternative Environmental Solutions, Inc. v. Allyson Campbell La. 2019
10/15/96), (“Absolute immunity attaches to all acts within a judge’s jurisdiction, even if those acts can be shown to have been performed with malice, in order to insure that all judges will be free to fulfill their responsibilities without the threat of civil prosecution by disgruntled litigants.”); Pierson v. Ray, 386
Tickle v. Ballay 259 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Molaison v. Lukinovich 142 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
More recently, in Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434, p. 3 (La.10/15/96), , we stated that “communications made in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings carry an absolute privilege so that witnesses, bound by their oaths to tell the truth, may speak freely without fear of civil suits for damages.” The court in the 1869 Louisiana Supreme Court decision, Terry v. Fellows, further explai
Garland Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
11 10/15/96), the supreme court made it clear that prosecutors have absolute immunity from claims of prosecutorial misconduct that is intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process.
Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System 128 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
p.0/15/96),12 , the supreme court made it clear that prosecutors have absolute immunity from claims of prosecu-torial misconduct that is intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process.
Mason Godfrey v. Paul Reggie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
10/15/96), the supreme court addressed the issue of whether prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity, concluding: We are persuaded that granting absolute immunity to prosecutors from malicious prosecution suits is appropriate when the activities complained of fall within the scope of the prosecut
Godfrey v. Reggie 94 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In Knapper v. Connick, 96-434, p. 10 (La.10/15/96), , the supreme court addressed the issue of whether prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity, concluding: We are persuaded that granting absolute immunity to prosecutors from malicious prosecution suits is appropriate when the activities complained of fall within the scope of the prosecutor’s role as an advoc
Mason Godfrey v. Paul Reggie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Godfrey v. Reggie 55 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434, p. 10 (La.10/15/96), .
Haley v. Leary 69 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434 *433 (La.1996) .
In Re Raspanti 8 So. 3d 526 La. 2009
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434, p. 3 (La.10/15/96), , citing Bienvenu v. Angelle, 254 La.
Bernberg v. Strauss 999 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. King 956 So. 2d 562 La. 2007
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434 (La.10/15/96), .
Ballard v. Waitz 951 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Relying on Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434 (La.10/15/96), -951 , the trial court concluded that even pretermit-ting whether there was just cause for the delay in setting the arraignment, under the undisputed facts, the district attorney was entitled to absolute immunity for his actions undertaken while engaged in or connected to judicial proceedings.
In Re Jordan 913 So. 2d 775 La. 2005
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434 (La.10/15/1996), .
Alan Corley v. Village of Florien and Mayor Rodney Jordan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Corley v. Village of Florien 889 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Zuber v. Buie 849 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0403, p. 3 (La.10/15/96), .
American LifeCare, Inc. v. Wood 826 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
at p. 9, 805 So.2d at 1124 , citing Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434, p. 3 (La.10/15/96), .
Marrogi v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1118 La. 2002
[8] More recently, in Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434, p. 3 (La.10/15/96), , we stated that "communications made in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings carry an absolute privilege so that witnesses, bound by their oaths to tell the truth, may speak freely without fear of civil suits for damages."
Sinclair v. State, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections 769 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434 (La.10/15/96), ; (La.App.
Gibson v. State 758 So. 2d 782 La. 2000
Hayes v. Parish of Orleans 737 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434 (La.10/15/96); , held that prosecutors have absolute immunity from claims of prosecutorial misconduct that is intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process and for their acts in initiating a prosecution and in presenting the state's case, i.e., conduct falling within the course and scope of their prosecutoria
Keller v. McElveen 744 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434 (La.10/15/96); .
Gibson v. State 731 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Fine v. Senette 714 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
He cites as authority Knapper v. Connick, 96-0434 (L a. 10/15/96); .
Smith v. State ex rel. Department of Administration 694 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
10/15/96); , the issue presented for review is whether a prosecutor, acting within the course and scope of his responsibilities in a criminal proceeding, is entitled to absolute immunity from a subsequent civil suit for damages for alleged malicious prosecution of the original criminal matter.