Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bullock v. Graham, 681 So. 2d 1248.

26 citing documents.

Kayla Landry v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, Et Al. La. 2022
1 1/1/96), abrogated on other grounds by Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
Stephen Swarthout v. Roger Driggers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
or value of $50,000, exclusive of interest and costs.” By stipulating the amount at issue in this controversy does not exceed $50,000, Mr. Swarthout acknowledged, the most he could recover is $50,000 for his injuries in conjunction 9 with the motor vehicle accident if he was not at fault in causing his damages.1 Bullock v. Graham, 96-711 (11/1/96), abrogated on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
Beggs v. Harrah's New Orleans Casino 158 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , abrogated on other grounds by Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
Samuel E. Russell v. Shetler Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
11/1/96), abrogated on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Insurance, 00-424 (La.
Russell v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 38 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Miller v. Lammico, 07-1352 (La.1/16/08), and Bullock v. Graham, 96-711 (La.11/1/96), , abrogated on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Insurance, 00-424 (La.11/28/00), .
Miller v. Lammico 973 So. 2d 693 La. 2008
Specifically, the doctors cite Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , abrogated on other grounds by Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
Pomier v. Moreland 951 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/5/03), , as follows: In Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , overruled on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
John Pomier v. Robert Moreland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
11/1/96), overruled on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
Paul Darren Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. and Venson R. Aymond La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Aymond 945 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The defendants hinge their position on a line of cases stemming from Bullock v. Graham, 96-711 (La.11/1/96), .
Gregory E. Williams v. Pamela Quinn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
11/1/96), overruled on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
Williams v. Quinn 858 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Louisiana Code Civil Procedure Article 5 provides, ‘When a plaintiff reduces his claim on a single cause of action to bring it within the jurisdiction of a court and judgment is rendered thereon, he remits the portion of his claim for which he did not pray for judgment, and is precluded thereafter from demanding it judicially.” In Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , overruled on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 848 So. 2d 559 La. 2003
The Fund cites to this court's decision in Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , overruled on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Ins.
Guidry v. Millers Cas. Ins. Co. 822 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , overruled in part on other grounds, Benoit v. Allstate Insurance Company, 00-0424 (La.11/28/00), .
Phillips v. Francis 817 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Furthermore, the court repudiated the part of its previous decision in Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , which concluded that the term "cause of action" is synonymous with the amount in controversy.
Benoit v. Allstate Ins. Co. 773 So. 2d 702 La. 2000
*707 The case of Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , was decided after the 1989 amendment to Article 1731(1).
Crawford v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF LA. 770 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711, p. 4 (La.11/1/96), .
Landry v. Allstate Insurance 768 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , the supreme court addressed the issue of whether a trial court could find there were damages in excess of a stipulated amount and then reduce those damages by the plaintiffs percentage of fault, thereby bringing the actual amount awarded within the stipulated limit.
Benware v. Means 760 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711, p. 4 (La.11/1/96), .
Adams v. Canal Indemnity Co. 760 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96); ; Black v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company, 93-878 (La.App.
Benoit v. Allstate Ins. Co. 751 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
art. 1732 since the 1989 amendments, Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , the court found that the terms "cause of action" and "amount in controversy" as used therein were "synonymous."
Hurst v. Louitt 745 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In reaching this conclusion, we are also guided by the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96), , the only previous case to note the change in language in La.
Pollet v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 751 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Robling v. Allstate Ins. Co. 711 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711, p. 4 *787 (La.11/1/96), .
McLaughlin v. Hill City Oil Co./Jubilee Exxon 702 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Bullock v. Graham, 96-0711 (La.11/1/96); .
Triche v. Allstate Ins. Co. 686 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
11/1/96); ; Stevens v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, 664 So.2d at 1212 .