DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 695 So. 2d 1326.

60 citing documents.

  • Bryant George, M.D. & Dura Mater, Inc. v. Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana D/B/A Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App.
  • Patterson v. Patterson 247 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    6/18/97), , and Rosell v. ESCO , (La.
  • Gardner Realtors, LLC v. Iteld 214 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Point Proven, LLC v. City of Monroe 214 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • Dawson v. Falgout 215 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Sudderth v. Mariner Electric Co. 193 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Kenner Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Rusich Detailing, Inc. 175 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Powell v. Reg’l Transit Auth., 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Arshad v. City of Kenner 95 So. 3d 477 La. 2012
  • Williams v. Moore 36 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 1996-0715 (La.06/18/97), .
  • Iles v. Ogden 37 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    We stated that “[a]fter it has been determined that there has been an *452 abuse of discretion, the appellate court can increase the amount of the award to the lowest reasonable amount within the discretion of the trier of fact.” The ruling in Rogers comports with the Louisiana Supreme Court’s statement in Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 n. 10 (La.6/18/97), , that “the award [of damages], if abusive of discretion, is not | ¡^disregarded, but rather is reduced to the highest amount
  • Brown v. Trask 998 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    6/18/97), Davis v. Witt, 02-3102, 02-3110 (La.
  • Fontenot v. PATTERSON INS. 972 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    See Powell v. Reg'l Transit Auth., 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; Davis v. Witt, 02-3102, 02-3110 (La.7/2/03), ; and Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001, 06-2164 (La.4/11/07), ___ So.2d.
  • The Cowboy Connection, Inc. v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    6/18/97), State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App.
  • Strother v. Continental Cas. Ins. Co. 944 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Blaine Strother v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America 938 So. 2d 35 La. 2006
    See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App.
  • Parker v. Robinson 925 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    The ruling in Rogers comports with the Louisiana Supreme Court's statement in Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), , 1332 n. 10 that "the award [of damages], if abusive of discretion, is not disregarded, but rather is reduced to the highest amount or raised to the lowest amount within the reasonable range of discretion."
  • Explained Tellis v. Lincoln Parish Police Jury 916 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    and the court’s general discussion of the problem of reconciliation in dicta in Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., and Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Mr. Darryl J. Simmons v. Sheriff Hal Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    6/18/97), (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court found the Act’s prohibition against a jury trial applicable to an employee of the Regional Transit Authority, an entity the supreme court noted to be a political subdivision at the time of trial).3 Alternatively, the plaintiffs contend that even if the employees of the s
  • Simmons v. Turner 888 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    See, e.g., Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court found the Act's prohibition against a jury trial applicable to an employee of the Regional Transit Authority, *361 an entity the supreme court noted to be a political subdivision at the time of trial).
  • Andrews v. Dufour 882 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, [Inc.], State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App.
  • James Helper, Elizabeth Gail Helper, Etc. v. Dr. Chih Hao Lin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Hepler v. Lin 869 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Powell v. Regional *974 Transit Authority, 96-715, p. 4 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Brown v. Brookshire's Grocery Co. 868 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Thompson v. Louisiana State Medical Center in Shreveport, 34,086 (La.App.2d Cir.11/1/00), citing Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Hays v. State 856 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Davis v. Witt 851 So. 2d 1119 La. 2003
    See Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; Griffin v. International Ins.
  • Williams v. Bass 847 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.06/18/97)
  • Carroll v. Holt 833 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; State v. Baxter, 33,188 (La.App.2d Cir.5/10/00), .
  • Robert v. Nelson 833 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; State v. Baxter, 33,188 (La.App.2d Cir.5/10/00), .
  • Madison v. ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENT. CENTER 834 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Applying the manifest error standard of review to the findings of both the judge and the jury in the instant case causes no inconsistency in result and does not raise the problem posed by the Supreme Court in Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715, p. 6 (La.6/18/97), , where it was pointed out that the application of the manifest error standard of review to the results of both the judge and the jury where the two conflicted "would not reconcile conflicting decisions if each decision was s
  • Robicheaux v. Adly 827 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715, p. 4 (La.6/18/97); .
  • Nick v. King Cab Co. 829 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; Bergeron v. Caston, 01-454 (La.App.
  • Miller v. Ford Motor Co. 815 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Powell v. Regional Transit Auth., 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • New South Communications v. Wright 803 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97)
  • Porter v. Porter 803 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    *403 Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; State v. Baxter, 33,188 (La.App.2d Cir.5/10/00), .
  • Gibbs v. Harris 799 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; (La.
  • Sieferman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 796 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Powell v. Regional Transit Auth., 96-0715 (La.6/18/97); .
  • Diamond v. Interstate Dodge, Inc. 796 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97)
  • Bergeron v. Caston 798 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • McCullin v. US Agencies Cas. Ins. Co. 786 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; Dixon v. Tillman, 29,483 (La.App.2d Cir.5/7/97), , writ denied, 97-1430 (La.9/19/97), .
  • Harris v. United Agents Insurance Co. of Louisiana 784 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App.
  • Jackson v. Madison Parish School Bd. 779 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    That court stated: The [supreme court in Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ] analyzed La.
  • Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 84 La. 2000
    See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App.
  • Hammock v. LSUMC 772 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; Dixon v. Tillman, 29,483 (La.App.2d Cir.5/7/97), , writ denied, 97-1430 (La.9/19/97), .
  • Scott v. Pyles 770 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715, p. 10 n. 10 (La.6/18/97), , 1332 n. 10.
  • Wood v. Subsea International, Inc. 766 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .
  • Morris v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 756 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; (La.
  • Harvey v. Bass Haven Resort, Inc. 758 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    See also Powell v. Regional Transit Auth., 96-715 (La.6/18/97); .
  • Ganucheau v. Winn Dixie LA., Inc. 746 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Powell v. Regional Transit Authority, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), .