Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler, 701 So. 2d 1308.

66 citing documents.

Cruse v. Louisiana State University Medical Center 792 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
In Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97), , the defendants argued that, because the trial judge did not have the opportunity to view the demeanor of witnesses, the manifest error standard should not apply to the review of his factual findings.
Garcia v. LOUISIANA DOTD 787 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Shephard on Behalf of Shepard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97) .
Hooper v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 782 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In Shephard v. Scheeler, et al., 96-1690 (La.10/21/97), [1] , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that pleas of guilty to charges of negligent homicide and reckless operation of a motor vehicle which were entered by a juvenile in a proceeding arising from an automobile accident were admissible as an admission against interest relevant to show fault in a subsequent civil actio
Darbonne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97); ; (La.App.
Nunez v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 774 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690, 96-1720 (La.10/21/97); ; Dixie Drive It Yourself v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Timmons v. Silman 743 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97), .
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 746 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690, 96-1720 (La.10/21/97); ; Dixie Drive It Yourself v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
10/21/97), , citing Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Company v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
Doyle v. McKinney 732 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Shephard on Behalf of Shepard v. Scheeler, 96-1690, p. 19 (La.10/21/97), .
Haile v. City of Monroe 722 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Shepard v. Scheeler, 96-1690, 96-1720, (La.10/21/97), .
Soileau v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 724 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
As explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690, p. 18 (La.10/21/97); , 1318: A presumption of negligence arises when a driver leaves his own lane of traffic and strikes another vehicle.
Dufrene v. Willingham 721 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Such a plea, however, is not a guilty plea and has no effect beyond the case in which it is entered
Tolbert v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 719 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
270 , Shepard on Behalf of Shepard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97); , Guy v. State, Dep't of Transp.
Washington v. Daste 749 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Moreover, we have been reminded only recently by the Supreme Court in Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690, p.14 (La.10/21/97), , when that court reiterated its position originally stated in Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
Netecke v. State ex rel. DOTD 715 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
The burden of proof is on the defendant to “show that he was not guilty of any dereliction, however slight.” Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690, p. 18 (La.10/21/97); .
Vigh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 706 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Only recently, the Supreme Court in Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97), reiterated its position originally stated in Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.