Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Seagers v. Pailet, 685 So. 2d 117.

15 citing documents.

Gladys S. Gautreaux Versus West Jefferson Medical Center La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Justin Thomas v. Otis Rashad Drew, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
1/6/97), (citations omitted), this court discussed the admissibility of an expert’s opinion regarding the standard of care in a medical malpractice case as follows: Where the alleged negligent acts raise issues which are limited and peculiar to the medical specialty involved, only those who are qual
Thomas v. Drew 240 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/6/97), (citations omitted), this court discussed the admissibility of an expert's opinion regarding the standard of care in a medical malpractice case as follows: Where the alleged negligent acts raise issues which are limited and peculiar to the medical specialty involved, only those who are qualified in that specialty may
Thibodeaux v. Donnell 189 So. 3d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 5/10/95) , -13 , writ denied, 96-2730 (La.1/6/97), (raising award of about $108,000 for past physical pain and suffering and for past, present, and future mental anguish and emotional distress to $150,000 to patient injured by two negligently performed surgeries; ob *479 stetrician/gyneeologist mispositioned patient’s bladder following cesarean section, causing abdomi
Clayton Bias v. Dr. Frederico Del Toro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
1/6/97) recognized that: “it is a specialist’s knowledge of the requisite subject matter, rather than the specialty within which the specialist practices, which determines whether a specialist may testify as to the degree of care 6 which should be exercised;.
Bias v. Del Toro 77 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/9/96), , writs denied, 96-2726, 96-2728 (La.1/6/97) , recognized that: “it is a specialist’s knowledge of the requisite subject matter, rather than the specialty within which the specialist practices, which determines whether a specialist may testify as to the degree of care 17which should be exercised; ....” Turner [v. Massiah, 94-29 (La.App.
Rose v. Travelers Insurance Co. 861 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 5/15/96) , , writ denied, 96-2730 (La.1/6/97), .
Short v. Plantation Management Corp. 781 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 10/9/96) , , writs denied, 96-2726 (La.1/6/97), , 96-2728 (La.1/6/97), .
Minvielle v. Minvielle 776 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 5/15/96) , ; writ denied, 96-2730 (La.1/6/97), .
Fusilier v. Dauterive 759 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 10/9/96); , writ denied, 96-2726 (La.1/6/97); , we discussed: Defendants' requested charge number six reflected the general rule that a medical specialty standard of care is "best determined from testimony of other experts in the field."
Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight Board v. Succession of Hedgepeth 754 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 5/15/96) , , writ denied, 96-2730 (La.1/6/97), .
Brown v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 715 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/15/96) , , writ denied, 96-2730 (La.1/6/97), , and Castillo v. Montelepre, Inc., 999 F.2d 931 (5th Cir.1993), but distinguishing Harden v. Southern Baptist Hosp., 94-2228 (La.App.
Delome v. Tulane Educational Fund 703 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
5 Cir. 5/15/96) , , writ denied 96- 2730 (La.1/6/97), , the issue was whether the doctor, who paid $100,000 to plaintiffs, owed interest.
Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc. 702 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 10/9/96); , writ denied, 96-2726, 96-2728 (La.1/6/97); , *1033 cited the first circuit decision in Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 92-1544, p. 14 (La.App.
Hedgepeth v. Guerin 691 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
5th Cir. 5/15/96), , writ denied, 96-2730 (La.1/6/97), .