Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ford v. Murphy Oil, USA, Inc., 710 So. 2d 235.

13 citing documents.

  • Joseph Harvey Gautreaux v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • Estate of Ehrhardt v. Jefferson Parish Fire Department 108 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 9/3/03), (citing Ford v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913, p. 1 (La.10/10/97), ).
  • Pollard v. Alpha Technical 102 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Preliminary Concerns In Ford v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913, pp. 4-5 (La.9/9/97), , 544-45 on reh’g in part sub nom, 96-2913 (La.10/10/97), , the Supreme Court discussed the history of class actions as follows: The class action is a nontraditional litigation procedure permitting a representative with typical claims to sue or defend on behalf of, and stand in judgment for, a class of similarly situated persons when the question is one of common or general
  • Bourgeois v. A.P. Green Industries, Inc. 39 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Tramontin v. Tramontin 928 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 9/3/03), , citing Ford v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913, p. 1 (La.10/10/97), ; see also Albert Tate, Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Daniels v. Witco Corp. 877 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Ford v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913 (La.10/10/97), .
  • Raymond v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 856 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See Ford v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913, p. 1 (La.10/10/97), (pointing out that because "amended pleadings will relate back to the originally filed petition, prescription of the individual claims will not be an issue provided that the original petition was timely filed.").
  • Davis v. American Home Products Corp. 844 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 11/4/98), , writ denied, 98-3016 (La.2/26/99), , this court distinguished Ford v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913 (La.9/9/97), ; on rehearing in part on other grounds, 96-2913 (La.10/10/97), .
  • Spitzfaden v. Dow Corning Corp. 833 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    (Emphasis added) On application for rehearing in Ford v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913 (La.10/10/97), , Chief Justice Calogero commented on La.
  • Ford v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc. 795 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See Ford v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc.
  • Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 790 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Ford v. Murphy Oil Co., 96-2913, 96-2917, 96-2929, (La.9/9/97), , on rehearing, 96-2913, (La.10/10/97), .
  • Richardson v. American Cyanamid Co. 757 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    On rehearing in Ford v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913 (La.10/10/97), , Justice Calogero comments on article 593.1(A): Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 593.1 expressly provides that "the action shall be dismissed" if the court finds that the action should not be maintained as a class action.
  • Andry v. Murphy Oil, USA, Inc. 710 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Defendants urge this Court to rely on the recent ruling in Ford v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913 (La.9/9/97), , reh'g granted in part, 96-2913 (La.10/10/97), , in which class certification was reversed based in part on the determination that the common character requirement for certification was not met.