Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brodtmann v. Duke, 708 So. 2d 447.

22 citing documents.

Elray and Brenda Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 2/11/98), this Court affirmed a $150,000 award to the decedent’s adult children—though we noted that it was on the high end of the spectrum—because the trial court found that the family was very close and relied upon the decedent as a “great source of emotional support.” 31
Barrios v. Safeway Insurance Co. 97 So. 3d 1019 La. 2012
Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 2/11/98), (citing Dixon v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 93-1627 (La.App.
Luminais v. O.R.S.T. Inc. 951 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Boucvalt v. SEA-TRAC OFFSHORE SERVICES 943 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/11/98) , , writ denied, 98-0645 (La.4/24/98), , and 98-0658 (La.4/24/98), ; cert.
Walter Randall v. the Rapides Foundation D/B/A Rapides Reg. Med. Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/11/98), writs denied, 98-0645, 98- 0658, -78 (La.
Bullock v. the Rapides Foundation 941 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/11/98), , writs denied, 98-0645, 98-0658 (La.4/24/98), -78, cert.
Norfleet v. LIFEGUARD TRANSP. SERVICE, INC. 934 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/11/98) ; ; Watkins v. Bethley, 27554 and 27555 (La.App.
Musacchia v. Hilton New Orleans Corp. 876 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 2/11/98), , 452 citing *912 Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland, Ohio, 409 U.S. 249, 252-253 , 93 S.Ct.
Celia Ann Marks v. Ohmeda, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Marks v. Ohmeda, Inc. 871 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Young v. Fitzpatrick 865 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
App. 4 Cir. 2/11/98), -460 .
Cornelia E. Young v. Kevin Fitzpatrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Turner v. Lyons 867 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
App. 4 Cir. 2/11/98), , the court reasoned that the award $150,000 to each of decedent's three adult children, although high, was not an abuse of discretion.
Williams v. Super Trucks, Inc. 842 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
4th Cir.2/11/98), , cert.
Brodtmann v. Duke 803 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Wright v. Hollywood Marine, Inc. 789 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 2/11/98), , this Court noted that under federal laJaw, the trial court has the discretion to deny prejudgment interest from the date of loss only when there are “peculiar circumstances” that would make it inequitable for the losing party to be forced to pay prejudgment interest.
Garcia v. LOUISIANA DOTD 787 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
App. 4 Cir. 2/11/98), -460 .
Lozano v. Touro Infirmary 778 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Guillot v. Valley Forge Ins. Co. 753 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 2/11/98) ; , writ denied, 98-0645 (La.4/24/98); , where the court affirmed the award of $500,000.00 to the widow of a sixty-four year old man, and also Mathieu v. State, Dept. of Transp.
Stroud v. Golson 744 So. 2d 1286 La. 1999
4 Cir. 2/11/98) , , writ denied, 98-0645 (La.4/24/98), , and 98-0658 (La.4/24/98), ; Baughman v. State, Dept. of Transp., 28,369 (La.App.
Savoie-Moore v. Moore 719 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 2/11/98) , , writs denied, 98-0645, 98-0658 (La.4/24/98), ; Dixon v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 93-1627, p. 4 (La.App.