Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc., 726 So. 2d 926.
- Ivy Cavalier and Ashley Rene Carbo Versus St. James Parish, Star Pipe Products, Ltd., Star Pipe USA, LLC, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
-
Odell Allen, Audry Allen, Nihesha Allen, and Lola Allen, Individually and on Behalf of Decedent, Joyce Allen v. …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 10/21/98), Vodanovich v. A.P.
-
Carolyn Brindell, John Brindell, III, Connie Dupay, and Christopher Brindell, Individually and on Behalf of Decedent John Brindell, …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 10/21/98), Vodanovich v. A.P.
-
Irene Marie Breaux, Individually, and on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Tabitha Caroline Breaux and Elwood James Breaux, …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
4 Cir. 10/21/98), this Court determined that a shipyard was not a sophisticated user 5 of manufactured asbestos-containing thermal pipe insulation, where no evidence was presented to show that the shipyard employees did anything more than purchase, install, remove and discard large
-
Elray and Brenda Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 10/21/98), Vodanovich v. A.P.
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Wiley Verstappen and Everest National Insurance Company, as Subrogee of 714 … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
-
Handy v. Owens Corning Corp.
262 So. 3d 965
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , , 948 ).
-
Upscale Fashions, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
254 So. 3d 784
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 10/21/98), , 974 (citing Lima v. Schmidt , ).
- Ron Warren, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. 2017
- Jimmy Williams, Sr. v. Placid Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
-
Ron Warren, Ind. & O/B/O Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
4th Cir.10/21/98), WL 790680.
-
Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.
196 So. 3d 776
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4th Cir.10/21/98), , 1998 WL 790680 .
- Thomas Nearhood v. Fitness Partners of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
-
Oddo v. Asbestos Corp.
173 So. 3d 1192
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/21/98), ; Vodanovich v. A.P.
- Alberes v. Anco Insulations, Inc. 156 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
Ambrose v. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts, LLC
105 So. 3d 180
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , stated: In order to preserve an objection to a jury charge for appeal, a party must specifically object at trial and must state reasons for the objection, and a general objection is insufficient.
- Wilbert Bates, Et Ux. v. E. D. Bullard Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Bates v. E.D. Bullard Co. 76 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Lucas v. Hopeman Bros., Inc. 60 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. 45 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee v. Mandry
40 So. 3d 500
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 4 Cir. 10/21/98), .
- Audubon Orthopedic & Sports Medicine, APMC v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 38 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
-
ADELMANN-CHESTER v. Kent
33 So. 3d 187
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , , discussed Halphen and the LPLA as follows: ...
-
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.
16 So. 3d 1065
La. 2009
4 Cir.10/21/98), ; Vodanovich v. A.P.
-
Benard v. EAGLE, INC.
1 So. 3d 588
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , ; Vodanovich v. A.P.
-
Clarkston v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
989 So. 2d 164
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 10/21/98), ; La.Code Civ.
-
Clarkston v. LA. FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. CO.
989 So. 2d 164
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 10/21/98), ; La.Code Civ.
-
Thibodeaux v. Asbestos Corp.
976 So. 2d 859
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4th Cir.10/21/98), at 948 .
- Woolfolk v. TRISM, INC. 976 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Brown v. Schwegmann 958 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
- Graves v. Riverwood Intern. Corp. 949 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
-
Zimko v. American Cyanamid
905 So. 2d 465
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4th Cir.10/21/98), at 948 .
- Siverd v. Permanent General Insurance Co. 894 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-
Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
878 So. 2d 631
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 10/21/98), ; Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 00-344, 00-856, p. 90 n. 23 (La.App.
-
Vodanovich v. AP Green Industries, Inc.
869 So. 2d 930
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4th Cir.10/21/98), at 948 .
-
Hennegan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co.
837 So. 2d 96
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , , this Court stated: "Unreasonably dangerous per se " denotes a product that is defective due to the fact that the risk imposed on the user outweighs the social utility of the product.
-
Asbestos v. Borden, Inc.
826 So. 2d 581
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , , 975: Ultimately, when prescription begins to run depends on the reasonableness of a plaintiff's action or inaction.
-
Blanchard v. Midland Risk Ins.
817 So. 2d 458
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 10/21/98); (emphasis in original).
-
Hoerner v. ANCO Insulations, Inc.
812 So. 2d 45
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , : In asbestos cases, the term "exposure" refers to inhalation of asbestos fibers into the lungs.
-
Seal v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
816 So. 2d 868
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 10/21/98), , stated: In order to preserve an objection to a jury charge for appeal, a party must specifically object at trial and must state reasons for the objection, and a general objection is insufficient.
-
Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc.
801 So. 2d 501
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 10/21/98) ; ; Smith v. A.C.
-
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
784 So. 2d 46
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
4th Cir.10/21/98), , the Fourth Circuit concluded that Halphen 's unreasonably dangerous per se liability constituted a substantive change in Louisiana products liability law that could not be applied retroactively, because the plaintiffs testified that their initial significant exposures occurred before Halphen .
-
Williams v. Williams
774 So. 2d 296
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 10/21/98) , , decision clarified on rehearing; Roger v. Dufrene, 97-1946 (La.App.
-
Hooker v. Super Products Corp.
751 So. 2d 889
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
4th Cir.10/21/98), , 1998 WL 790680 .
- Bergeron v. Pan American Assur. Co. 731 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999