DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alliance for Affordable Energy v. Frick, 695 So. 2d 1126.

14 citing documents.

  • R.T. Talley v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    App. 0 Cir. 5/ 28/ 97), - 1135 ( absent an allegation that the records at issue contained the " mental impressions, conclusions, opinions or theories of an attorney or an expert, obtained or prepared in anticipation of litigation or in preparation for trial," there was no basis to hold that the records requested were exempt from
  • Patrick Lacour v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • Lewis v. Morrell 215 So. 3d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4 Cir. 5/28/97), (emphasis added).
  • Hatcher v. Rouse 211 So. 3d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4 Cir. 5/28/97), (emphasis added).
  • New Orleans Bulldog Society v. Louisiana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 200 So. 3d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 5/28/97), 96-1763, p. 17, (Public Records Law is intended to enforce the public’s right to public records “in the most expansive and unrestricted way possible.”) (quoting Title Research Corp., supra); (La.App.
  • Shane v. Parish of Jefferson 150 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Brown v. Serpas 112 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • First NBC Bank v. Gusman 79 So. 3d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
  • VANDENWEGHE v. Parish of Jefferson 70 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 5/28/97) , , the court held that whether a public record is exempt from disclosure may be determined in the mandamus proceeding.
  • Skamangas v. Stockton 867 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    App. 4th Cir.5/28/97), .
  • Kyle v. Perrilloux 868 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • In re Trestman 795 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Burkett v. UDS Management Corp. 741 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 5/28/97), -33 (first emphasis added), the court stated that: A custodian of public records has a statutory duty to provide immediate access to records that are available.
  • Hunter v. Pennington 726 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 5/28/97) , , this court held that the custodian's response that the requested documents were not "in [his] possession" did not satisfy the Public Records Law because the custodian may not avoid his responsibility under the law by transferring physical possession to another.