DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wascom v. Wascom, 691 So. 2d 678.

14 citing documents.

  • Boudreaux v. Vankerkhove 993 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    1st Cir.), writ denied, abrogated in part on different grounds by Wascom v. Wascom, 96-0125 (La.4/18/97), .
  • Maggio v. Maggio 981 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Unlike alimony pendente lite, which was terminated by a judgment of divorce (), the claim for and termination of an interim allowance is independent of the divorce judgment.
  • Laura Leonard Leblanc v. Mitchel Brett Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 953 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    1st Cir.)[wni denied, abrogated on other grounds, Wascom v. Wascom, 96-0125 (La.4/8/97), ].
  • Sharp v. Sharp 939 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    2 In Wascom v. Wascom, 96-0125, p. 4 (La.4/8/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated that in examining the nature and purpose of former La.
  • Garcia v. Rodriguez 839 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Diego Rodriguez argues that the award of alimony pendente lite was awarded after the divorce was finalized, in violation of Wascom, v. Wascom, 96-0125 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Jones v. Jones 793 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Unlike alimony pendente lite, which was terminated by a judgment of divorce (), the claim for and termination of an interim allowance is independent of the divorce judgment.
  • Defatta v. Defatta 750 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    See, Wascom v. Wascom, 96-0125 (La.4/8/87), .
  • McDermott v. McDermott 741 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    See Wascom v. Wascom, 96-0125 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Weldon v. Weldon 737 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Wascom v. Wascom, 96-0125 (La.4/8/97); .
  • Almon v. Almon 718 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    [9] 96-0125, p. 4 (La.4/08/97), , citing McAlpine v. McAlpine, 94-1594, p. 9 (La.9/05/96), , 90.
  • Tull v. Tull 704 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Wascom v. Wascom, 96-0125, p. 4 (La.4/8/97); .
  • Watts v. Watts 699 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    However, the judgment signed that day also directed that “the provisions of that Judgment on Rule herein signed August 19, 1996, shall remain in full force and effect.” In Wascom v. Wascom, 96-0125 (La.4/8/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that alimony pendente lite may not continue for any period of time after the rendering of the final judgment of divorce.
  • Unkel v. Unkel 699 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    That reasoning has been rejected and impliedly overruled in Wascom v. Wascom, 96-CC-0125 (La.4/8/97), .