Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Keith v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co., 694 So. 2d 180.

91 citing documents.

Naquin v. Titan Indem. Co. 779 So. 2d 704 La. 2001
Co., 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), ("Procedural laws prescribe a method for enforcing a previously existing substantive right and relate to the form of the proceeding or the operation of the laws.").
Fleniken v. Entergy Corp. 780 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075, pp. 3-4 (La.5/9/97), -182 , the court discussed the development of the jurisprudence on this subject.
Snearl v. Mercer 780 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Keith v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 96-2075, p. 7 (La.5/9/97), .
Jackson v. America's Favorite Chicken Co. 778 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Crooks v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 779 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97); .
Frazer v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 774 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075, pp. 5-7 (La.5/9/97), -83 , stated: Comparing La.
Dennis v. the Finish Line, Inc. 781 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , the supreme court decided that the 1996 amendment to Article 2323 should be applied retroactively.
Fontenot v. Fontenot 774 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Article 6 requires a two-fold inquiry.
Grayson v. RB Ammon and Associates, Inc. 778 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company, 96-2075, p. 5 (La.5/9/97), .
Glover v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. 769 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In response to this change in the law, plaintiffs counsel, anticipating that the amendment may be held to be retroactive, as it in fact was in Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , investigated whether there may be any fault on the part of Ryder that would require its join-der.
In Re Basf Corporation's Exemption Permit 765 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), ; Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish School Board, 93-1916 (La.2/28/94), ; Adams v. City of Baton Rouge, 95-2515 (La.App.
Green v. Southern United Fire Ins. Co. 762 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), .
Moses v. Grambling State University 762 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2347 , 141 L.Ed.2d 717 (1998); Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), ; Hunter v. Town of Sibley, 32,075 (La.App.2d Cir.10/29/99), , writ denied, 99-3351 (La.2/18/00), .
Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co. 760 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
[5] Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075, p. 5 (La.5/9/97), .
Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES 753 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
[5] In Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075 (La.05/09/97), , the supreme court held that the legislative amendment to La.
Poole v. Jefferson Parish Recreation Department 750 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., 96-2075, (La.5/9/97) , and are applied prospectively only.
Johnson v. Rogers & Phillips, Inc. 753 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Johns v. Agrawal 748 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Hunter v. Town of Sibley 745 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Dixie Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Pitre 751 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , 183: The general rule against retroactive application of legislative enactments and its exceptions, is codified in La.Civ.Code.
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97); .
Hooker v. Super Products Corp. 751 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Coulon v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 734 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Alternatively, the trial court erred in failing to quantify the percentage of fault attributable to Mr. Lucius Hebert/Pro-Bicycle Service, pursuant to Louisiana Civil Code article 2323 and Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97); and in finding Wal-Mart stores 100% liable for the actions and/or inactions of another party where all of the evidence presented at trial indicated that another party (Mr. Hebert) was responsible for the damages sustained by Grant Cou
Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
05/09/97), , the supreme court held that the 1996 revision of La.
State v. Johnson 734 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1st Cir.5/15/98); ; writ granted on other grounds, 98-1603 (La.12/11/98); ; Keith v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 96-2075, p. 7 (La.5/9/97); -183 .
Cazes v. Parish of West Baton Rouge 744 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co., 96-2075, p. 7 (La.5/9/97); , the supreme court determined that the amendment to La.C.C.
Shephard ex rel. Shephard v. Scheeler 731 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
and Develop *304 ment, 97-1938, 97-1967 (La.4/24/98), , which-held that although Act 3’s amendment of 2323 was merely procedural legislation to be applied retroactively (See, Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), ), the amendment to La.C.C.
Bauer v. Viacom, Inc. 729 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
art. 2323 was merely procedural legislation and applies retroactively [See, Keith v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La 5/9/97); ].
Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), -183 , stated: Comparing La.Civ.Code art. 2323, as amended, to its predecessor, it is apparent that the basic structure for comparative fault is unchanged.
Moore v. Kansas City Southern R. Co. 722 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , would permit the assessment of non-party fault.
Nassif v. Sunrise Homes, Inc. 720 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Wijngaarde v. Parents of Guy 720 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , the Supreme Court concluded that the legislative changes reflected in Act 3 are procedural and can be applied retroactively.
Pommier v. ABC Ins. Co. 715 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97); .
Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 716 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , interpreting Act 3 of the 1996 Extraordinary Legislative Session, amending LSA-C.C.
State v. Hayes 712 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075, p. 7 (La.5/9/97); -83 .
Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 712 So. 2d 62 La. 1998
Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , mandates retroactive application of the 1996 amendment to La.
Babb v. Boney 710 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
We also note that in Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , the Supreme Court held that another portion of Act 3 that requires the fact finder to quantify employer fault or any other third party fault is a procedural provision and therefore applies retroactively.
Peak v. Tuscaloosa Commerce Bank 707 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Morgan v. Earnest Corp. 704 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075, p. 5 (La.5/9/97); .
Petroleum Rental Tools, Inc. v. Hal Oil & Gas Co. 701 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , the court discussed the development of the jurisprudence on the subject.