Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. DeRouen, 678 So. 2d 39.

20 citing documents.

State v. Andrews (In re Andrews) 255 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 6/26/96), , 40.
State v. Quinn 136 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Dillon 124 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. McQuirter 108 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 6/26/96) , (fifteen months between institution of prosecution and motion to quash not violative of the statute); cf. and see Love, 00-3347, (twenty-two-month delay presumptively prejudicial); State v. Ervin, 08-1078 (La.App.
State v. Shannon 17 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Stewart 983 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Chisolm 983 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 6/26/96) , (finding fifteen month delay in prosecuting two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and one count of possession of 28 to 200 grams of cocaine not violative of the right to a speedy trial) (La.App.
State v. Chambers 966 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 6/26/96), , fifteen months elapsed between institution of prosecution and the granting of the motion to quash.
State v. Scott 958 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 6/26/96) , (finding fifteen month delay in prosecuting two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and one count of possession of 28 to 200 grams of cocaine not violative of the right to a speedy trial) (La.App.
State v. Payton 954 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Shanklin 953 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 6/26/96) , (fifteen months elapsed between institution of prosecution and motion to quash two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and one count of possession of 28 to 200 grams of cocaine not violative).
State v. Guice 950 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 6/26/96), , fifteen months elapsed between institution of prosecution and the granting of the motion to quash.
State v. Walker 947 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 6/26/96), , fifteen months elapsed between institution of prosecution and the granting of the motion to quash.
State v. Bias 947 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 6/26/96) , (fifteen months elapsed between institution of prosecution and motion to quash two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and one count of possession of 28 to 200 grams of cocaine not violative).
State v. Batiste 939 So. 2d 1245 La. 2006
4 Cir. 6/26/96) , ; State v. Esteen, 95-1079 (La.
State v. Keller 859 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Santiago 853 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Love 847 So. 2d 1198 La. 2003
App. 4 Cir. 6/26/96), ; State v. Esteen, 95-1079 (La.App.
State v. Shorts 705 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 6/26/96), , 40: The Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure establishes two time periods relevant to the institution and prosecution of a criminal matter.