DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hawkins, 688 So. 2d 473.

142 citing documents.

  • State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Robinson, 99-2236, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 804 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Barnes 800 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Lawrence, 752 So.2d at 943 , citing State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 5 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Chattman 800 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), , the defendant claimed that his conviction should be reversed because of the lack of transcripts of opening statements, closing arguments and jury instructions.
  • State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), (citing State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ).
  • State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
    See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), ; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Allen, 95-1754, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
  • State v. Allen 788 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Brauner 782 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 ; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Davis 781 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Laneheart 778 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    App. 4th Cir. 9/15/95), , writ granted on other grounds 96-0766 (La.9/13/96), , and affirmed by 96-0766 (La.1/14/97) .
  • State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Robinson 772 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Ventry 765 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Walker 764 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Carter 762 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    art. 807; Craig ; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Porter 761 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Although the supreme court did not discuss the error patent, the court affirmed Hawkins' conviction in State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97); .
  • State v. Thompson 752 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, pp. 4-5 (La.1/14/97), , the Supreme Court stated: Under La.Code Evid.
  • State v. Lawrence 752 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 5 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. McKinney 749 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); See also State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 (La.1/14/97), , 479 and State v. McPherson, 98-1207, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Milto 751 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    See State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Brown 746 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 (La.1/14/97), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Allen 742 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Robinson 738 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Patterson 742 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97); .
  • State v. Guy 737 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 9/15/95), n. 1 , affirmed, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Pascual 735 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Jackson 733 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Stoltz, 98-235 (La.App.
  • State v. Alexander 734 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Causey 721 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 (La.1/14/97), (citations omitted).
  • State v. R.W. 721 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In circumstantial evidence cases, when the factfinder reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence offered by the defendant in his own testimony, “that hypothesis fails, and the defendant is guilty, unless there is another hypothesis which raises a [^reasonable doubt.” State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97)
  • State v. Westmoreland 721 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Jackson v. Virginia, supra; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Snyder, 97-226, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. Alexander 720 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Snyder, 97-226, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. Butler 714 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    See also State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.01/14/97), .
  • State v. Perkins 716 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    4 Cir. 9/15/95) ; , affirmed, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97); .
  • State v. Harris 711 So. 2d 266 La. 1998
    State v. Quatrevingt, 93-1644, p. 16 (La.2/28/96), ; State v. Everidge, 96-2647, p. 8 (La.12/2/97), ; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 p. 5 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Hopson 703 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    1/14/97) , 479 the court explained: An appellate court reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence must determine that the trial evidence, whether direct or circumstantial, or a mixture of both, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of
  • State v. Goodwin 703 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 (La.1/14/97), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Pardon 703 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97); .
  • State v. Snyder 700 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 *1089 (La.1/14/97), ; Jackson v. Virginia, supra ; State v. Nguyen, 95-1055, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Brumley 700 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 7 (La.1997), .