DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Calhoun, 694 So. 2d 909.

52 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Michael Handley A/K/A Lawrence M. Handley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    5/20/97), the supreme court interpreted La.R.S.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joza L. Wise La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    5/20/97), State v. Cooper, supra.
  • State v. Robinson 275 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State v. Marenco 236 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Cheatham 222 So. 3d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    5/20/97), , Finding the record on appeal adequate to resolve the issue, we address the defendant’s contention that his guilty plea was induced by erroneous advice from counsel.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lorrie A. Anderson AKA Lorrie Ann Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Anderson 214 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Hart 183 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Harris, 43,069 (La.App.2d Cir.3/19/08), ; State v. Cook, 32,110 (La.App.2d Cir.6/16/99), .
  • State v. Mitchell 169 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.05/20/97), ; State v. Harris, 43,069 (La.App.2d Cir.03/19/08), .
  • State v. Jenkins 172 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also State v. Calhoun, 96-0786, p. 10 (La.5/20/97), (“[Cjounsel’s role at the guilty plea stage ...
  • State v. Bias 167 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. O'Brien 168 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Ledet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5/20/97), ).1 While the supreme court acknowledged that the failure to notify a defendant of the registration requirements may vitiate the voluntariness of the guilty plea, this is only a factor for the courts to consider, and failure alone does not mandate that we vacate a guilty plea.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Millard Irby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone A. Murray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Murray 117 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Calhoun, 696-786, p. 7 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Stewart 109 So. 3d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Calhoun, 1996-0786 (La.05/20/97), ; State v. Harris, 48,069 (La.App.2d Cir.03/19/08), .
  • State v. Bazile 106 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    He relies upon State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), , in which the state supreme court found that the trial court’s failure to advise the defendant of the sex offender registration requirements before accepting his guilty plea was a factor that undercut the volun-tariness of his plea.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wendell Joseph Bienvenu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/15/11), __ So.3d __as follows:5 In support of his contention, Defendant refers to State v. Calhoun, 96–786 (La.5/20/97), in which the trial court did not advise the defendant at the guilty plea stage, either in writing or in the guilty plea colloquy, of the provisions of the sex offender registration laws.
  • State v. Young 71 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1981); see also State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. R.A.L. 69 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In State v. Calhoun, 96-786 (La.5/20/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the failure of a trial court to advise a defendant of the registration requirement is one factor that can be considered to undercut the voluntary nature of a guilty plea when considering the “totality of the circumstances” under which the plea was taken.
  • State v. RAL 69 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    In State v. Calhoun, 96-786 (La.5/20/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the failure of a trial court to advise a defendant of the registration requirement is one factor that can be considered to undercut the voluntary nature of a guilty plea when considering the "totality of the circumstances" under which the plea was taken.
  • State of Louisiana v. G. T., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    5/20/97), in which the trial court did not advise the defendant at the guilty plea stage, either in writing or in the guilty plea colloquy, of the provisions of the sex offender registration laws.
  • State v. GT, JR. 71 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In support of his contention, Defendant refers to State v. Calhoun, 96-786 (La.5/20/97), , in which the trial court did not advise the defendant at the guilty plea stage, either in writing or in the guilty plea colloquy, of the provisions of the sex offender registration laws.
  • State v. Ellis 67 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Smith 38 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In remanding this matter for an eviden-tiary hearing after defendant’s first appeal, this Court acknowledged State v. Calhoun, 96-786 (La.5/20/97), , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the failure of the trial court to advise a defendant of the sex registration requirements before accepting his guilty plea is a factor “that undercuts the voluntariness of that plea.” We specifically noted that the supreme court expressed no opinion of whether the failur
  • State, in the Interest of Jw 17 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Smith 993 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Calhoun, 96-786, p. 9 (La.5/20/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the failure of the trial court to advise a defendant of the sex registration requirements before accepting his guilty plea is a factor "that undercuts the voluntariness of that plea."
  • State v. Harris 980 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Cook, 32,110 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel R. Fontenot, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    5/20/97), the court approved a six-year sentence under La.R.S.
  • State v. Fontenot 934 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    1 Cir. 2/23/96) , , rev'd on other grounds, 96-786 (La.5/20/97), , the court approved a six-year sentence under La.R.S.
  • State v. Moore 847 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    See State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97); ; State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01); , State v. Blaine Andre Williams, 02-0707 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 839 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In State v. Calhoun, 96-786 (La.5/20/97); , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that, in light of the totality of circumstances under which the defendant pled guilty to a sex offense, the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw the plea.
  • State v. Irving 818 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.05/20/97), ; Nicholas, supra ; Essex, supra .
  • State v. Raines 788 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Raines 788 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Grogan 786 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97); .
  • State v. Blanchard 786 So. 2d 701 La. 2001
    The court of appeal considered this factor critical in light of our decision in State v. Calhoun, 96-0786, p. 9 (La.5/20/97), , in which we found that a similar failing by the trial judge constituted "a factor that undercut[] the voluntariness of that plea."
  • State v. Burnett 768 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    In State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), , the supreme court held that the district court's failure to advise a defendant of the registration requirements for sex offenders before accepting his guilty plea is a factor that undercuts the voluntariness of the plea.
  • State v. Johnson 769 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Citing State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), , this Court reversed the trial court's ruling and remanded this case for further proceedings.
  • State v. Green 765 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    1st Cir. 2/23/96), , reversed on other grounds 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), , the First Circuit concluded: Registration under La.
  • State v. King 761 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. McGee 758 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Holmes, supra .
  • State v. Myers 753 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786, p. 9 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State ex rel. Chauvin v. State 814 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Relying on State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), , he argued that his plea was involuntarily and unintelligently entered because of the court’s failure to advise him of the notification requirements.
  • State v. Griffin 748 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    The prosecutor disputed that, citing State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), , in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the failure to provide notice under that statute is a factor, but not the only factor, to consider in determining whether a guilty plea has been voluntarily entered.
  • State v. Moore 743 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.05/20/97), .
  • State v. Cook 742 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1980); State v. Dixon, supra ; c.f., State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Sebastien 730 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Walton 738 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    State v. Calhoun, 96-786 (La.5/20/97); (La.