DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Denis, 691 So. 2d 1295.

30 citing documents.

  • State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gayden 133 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , (-102 (La.1979)).
  • State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Francis 60 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Brown 895 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Craft 870 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Lange 832 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , : While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a pat down for weapons.
  • State v. Gullette 780 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), , wherein the court found that such an articulation was necessary for a court to apply La.Code Crim.P.
  • State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), : While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a pat down for weapons.
  • State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.3/19/97), , writ denied 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), , addressed the requirements imposed by La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), : While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a pat-down for weapons.
  • State v. Hughes 765 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.3/19/97), , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), : While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a pat down for weapons.
  • State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), : While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a pat-down for weapons.
  • State v. Myers 756 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    art. 215.1 A authorizes Terry stops under certain circumstances, "[a]n inchoate, unparticularized hunch is insufficient grounds for detention under Article 215.1 A." State v. Denis, 96-0956 (La.App.4th Cir. 3/19/97), ; State v. Jackson, 26,138 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/17/94), .
  • State v. Fortier 756 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 3/19/97), , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), : We recognize that the police have the right to ensure their own safety in an encounter with a suspected criminal.
  • State v. Tyler 749 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , *773 writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), : While it is true that an officer is never justified in conducting a pat-down for weapons unless the original detention itself was justified, a lawful detention for questioning does not necessarily give the officer the authority to conduct a pat-down for weapon
  • State v. Dereyna 750 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , the court stated: We recognize that the police have the right to ensure their,own safety in an encounter with a suspected criminal.
  • State v. Johnson 748 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    4th Cir.3/19/97), , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), .
  • State v. Dappemont 734 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4th Cir. 3/19/97), , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97); , police officers, on patrol in a high crime area, noticed that the defendant was motioning to passing pedestrians.
  • State v. Smiley 729 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 3/19/97), , writ denied 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), : We recognize that the police have the right to ensure their own safety in an encounter with a suspected criminal.
  • State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 3/19/97), , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), : We recognize that the police have the right to ensure their own safety in an encounter with a suspected criminal.
  • State v. Sheehan 740 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    4th Cir.3/19/97), , writ denied 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), , addressed the requirements imposed by La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Neal 719 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , writ denied 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), .
  • State v. Barney 708 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , the court said: We recognize that the police have the right to ensure their own safety in an encounter with a suspected criminal.
  • State v. Benjamin 703 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , writ denied 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), .
  • State v. Stan 703 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.
  • State v. Basile 700 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4 Cir. 3/19/97) , , writ denied, 97-1006 (La.6/20/97), .
  • State v. Ratliff 700 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    App. 4 Cir. 3/19/97), , writ den.
  • State v. Anderson 696 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997