Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Deroche, 682 So. 2d 1251.

17 citing documents.

State v. Deville 879 So. 2d 689 La. 2004
State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 2 (La.11/8/96), ; (La.
State v. Bush 873 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
See, State v. Deroche, 96-1376 (La.11/8/96), (per curiam); State v. Nabak, 03-919 (La.12/30/03), ; State v. Granier, 03-447 (La.App.
State v. Frisella 868 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 9/30/03) , ; State v. Deroche, 96-1376 (La.11/8/96), .
State v. Nabak 864 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
See, State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), , State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 1 (La.11/8/96), (per curiam), quoting State v. Strain, supra .
State v. Theriot 782 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In State v. Deroche, 96-1376 (La.11/8/96), (citations omitted), the court held: The accused's signature on a printed waiver form advising him of his right to counsel and warning him of the danger of self-representation, and the signature of the trial judge on the same form that he is satisfied the accused understood the nature of his plea and its consequ
Distinguished State v. Frickey 769 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[4] Defendant also relies on State v. Deroche, 96-1376, pp. 1-2 (La.11/8/96), , in which the court found the predicate plea infirm.
State v. Cadiere 754 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Lodrigue, 712 So.2d at 673 , citing, State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 1 (La.11/8/96), .
State v. Boudreaux 756 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
In State v. Deroche, 96-1376 (La.11/8/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the First Circuit, which had held that a minute entry and a waiver of rights form, taken together, reflected that the defendant had been advised of his Boykin [2] rights, including the right to counsel, even though the minutes were silent as to the defendant's right to counsel.
State v. Bourque 757 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Deshotel 730 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
The trial judge must expressly advise the defendant of his right to counsel, and determine “on the record that the waiver is made knowingly and intelligently under the circumstances.” State v. Strain, 585 So.2d at 543 ; State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 1 (La.11/8/96); .
State v. White 727 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 1 (La.11/8/96); .
State v. Stevison 721 So. 2d 843 La. 1998
See State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 2 (La.11/8/96), (uncounseled misdemeanor convictions may not serve as the predicate for enhancement of a subsequent DWI offense); (same).
State v. Lambert 720 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
See, e.g., State v. Deroche, 96-1376 (La.11/8/96); ; (La.App.
State v. Lodrigue 712 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 1 (La.11/8/96), .
State v. Guidry 709 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
derstood the nature of his plea and its consequences, do not discharge the duty of the trial judge to advise the defendant expressly of his right to counsel and to determine “ ‘on the record that the waiver is made knowingly and intelligently under the circumstances,’ taking into account such factors as the defendant’s age, background, and education.” State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 1 (La.11/8/96); .
State v. Snider 707 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Sadler 693 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Deroche, 96-1376 (La.11/8/96); .