Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Banks, 692 So. 2d 1051.

29 citing documents.

State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
State v. Ross 195 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
at p. 26, 163 So.3d at 88 ( and State v. Banks, 96-2227, pp. 3-4, (La.4/18/97), ).
State of Louisiana v. Latracus Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Henry 178 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Banks, 96-2227, pp. 4 (La.4/18/97) .
State v. White 174 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La] 284/18/97), .
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In addition, a mistrial is a drastic remedy that “is not warranted absent a determination that the jurors were actually exposed to the publicity in question and were so impressed by it as to be incapable of rendering a fair and impartial verdict.” see State v. Banks, 96-2227, pp. 3-4 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“[T]he determination of whether prejudice has resulted lies in the sound discretion of the trial judge.” State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), (internal quotation omitted).
State v. Ruffin 82 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Tillman 74 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Green 69 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 775 prejudicial conduct may include pretrial or midtrial publicity, a mistrial is not warranted “absent a determination that the jurors were actually exposed to the publicity in question and were so impressed by it as to be incapable of rendering a fair and impartial verdict.” State v. Banks, 96-2227 at pp. 2-3 (La.4/18/97), ().
State v. Vidrine 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Banks, 96-2227 (La.4/18/97), .
State of Louisiana v. Casey Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Banks, 96-2227 (La.4/18/97)
State v. Adams 976 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Burbank 971 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 3/1/05), , writ denied, 05-0830 (La.11/28/05), , citing State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Austin 900 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State of Louisiana v. Gary Dewayne Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2/11/00), this court stated: Regarding the scope of our review of trial court rulings on motions for mistrial, a “[m]istrial is a drastic remedy generally and the determination ‘of whether prejudice has resulted lies in the sound discretion of the trial judge.’ ” State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97); (quoting State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94); cert.
State v. Hamilton 867 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 2/3/99), -79 , writ denied, 99-2499 (La.2/11/00), , this court stated: 11sRegarding the scope of our review of trial court rulings on motions for mistrial, a “[mjistrial is a drastic remedy generally and the determination ‘of whether prejudice has resulted lies in the sound discretion of the trial judge.’ ” State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97); (quoting State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94); , cert.
State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Ware 795 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Banks, 96-2227 (La.4/18/97), , on remand, 95-1210 (La.App.
State v. Calhoun 776 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Banks, 96-2227 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Prater 762 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Sartain 746 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Martello 748 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
State v. Banks, 96-2227 (La.4/18/97)
State v. Finch 730 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Bishop 734 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Regarding the scope of our review of trial court rulings on motions for mistrial, a "[m]istrial is a drastic remedy generally and the determination `of whether prejudice has resulted lies in the sound *679 discretion of the trial judge.'" State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97); (quoting State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94); , cert.
State v. Adams 715 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Banks, 96-2227 (La.4/18/97), .
State v. Hayden 707 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Banks, 96-2227 (La.4/18/07), ; State v. Carter, 96-358 (La.App.