Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bowie, 687 So. 2d 369.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Epps La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
In State v. Bowie, 96–2987 (La.1/31/97), the state supreme court implicitly approved this procedure as it granted writs to provide guidance regarding the new Boykin hearing but declined to exercise its supervisory authority further.
State Of Louisiana v. Deborah Shirley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Damari Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
In State v. Bowie, 96–2987 (La.1/31/97), the state supreme court implicitly approved this procedure as it granted writs to provide guidance regarding the new Boykin hearing but declined to exercise its supervisory authority further.
State of Louisiana v. Rosalyn Faith Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Frank Allen Fregia, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/31/97), the state supreme court implicitly approved this procedure as it granted writs to provide guidance regarding the new Boykin hearing but declined to exercise its supervisory authority further.
State v. Fregia 105 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In State v. Bowie, 96-2987 (La.1/31/97), , the state supreme court implicitly approved this procedure as it granted writs to provide guidance regarding the new Boykin hearing but declined to exercise its supervisory authority further.
State of Louisiana v. Juane Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1/31/97), as it granted writs to provide guidance regarding the new Boykin hearing but declined to implement its supervisory authority.
State v. Desoto 6 So. 3d 141 La. 2009
State v. Desoto 968 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/13/96), , writ granted on other grounds, 96-2987 (La.1/31/97), .
State of Louisiana v. Jake C. Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Gaspard 820 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
See State v. Bowie 96-2987 (La.1/31/97), .
State v. Adams 815 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Allen 781 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
The requirements for a valid acceptance of an Alford plea were stated in a per curiam decision, State v. Bowie, 96-2987, pp. 1-2 (La.1/31/97), : The potential strength of the state's case and of any defenses reasonably suggested by the evidence may represent significant factors for the district court to weigh in accepting a proffered guilty plea which does not constitute an express admission of guilt, North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37-38 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Tauzin 720 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 11/13/96) ; , 72 writ granted and provided guidance for remand, 96-2987 (La.1/31/97); , [ (La.App.
State v. Bowie 705 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Bowie, 96-2987 (La.1/31/97); .