DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bourque, 699 So. 2d 1.

31 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
    7/1/97), (“Louisiana’s scheme narrows the substantive definition of first degree murder to restrict the class of death-eligible cases and further provides for a sentencing hearing in which the jury may make a binding decision that the defendant receive a sentence of life imprisonment.
  • State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
  • State v. Cooper 223 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
  • State v. Woodberry 171 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    As noted by the Court in State v. Bourque, 96-0842, p. 15 (La.7/1/97), , 11: “It is within the trial court’s discretion to exclude the evidence or enter any 122other appropriate order to remedy a party’s violation of a discovery right.
  • State v. Hatfield 155 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842, p. 15 (La.7/1/97), ; see also State ex rel.
  • State v. Girard 110 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (citing State v. Bourque, 96-842 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State v. Thompson 12 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    See State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
    Giving deference to the good sensibility and fairmindedness of juries, State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97); , and after reviewing the argument as a whole and the limited nature of the prosecutor's objectionable comments therein, we can conclude that the comments did not influence the jury or contribute to the death sentence.
  • State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
    See State v. Bourque, 96-0842, p. 15 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
    1993), appeal after remand, XXXX-XXXX (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    In State v. Bourque, 96-0842 p. 13 (La.7/1/97), , we refined that understanding by noting that the instruction calls for the jury "to eschew sympathy altogether."
  • State v. Bartley 871 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Bourque, 96-842 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Chaplain 852 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/7/01) , , appeal after remand, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97) , cert.
  • State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    [52] appeal after remand, 96-842 (La.7/1/97); , cert.
  • State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    appeal after remand., 96-842 (La.7/1/97); , cert.
  • State v. Ormond 786 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/92), .
  • State v. Bourgeois 786 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    at 1722-1723 ; State v. Bourque, 96-842 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Sholes 782 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    appeal after remand, (La.
  • State v. Lowery 781 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    appeal after remand, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Lee 778 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Taylor 759 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Under those rules, “[i]t is within the trial court’s discretion to exclude the evidence or enter any appropriate order to remedy a party’s violation of a discovery right.” State v. Bourque, 96-0842, p. 15 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Givens 750 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Matthews v. Arkla Lubricants Inc. 740 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986); State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.07/01/97), , U.S. cert.
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    Giving deference to the good sensibility and fairmindedness of juries, State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97); , and after reviewing the argument as a whole and the limited nature of the prosecutor's inelegant comments therein, it seems fair to determine that the comments did not influence the jury or contribute to the death sentence.
  • State v. Lewis 732 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
    State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), ( Bourque II ).
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
    Most recently, in State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), , this court ultimately concluded that the district attorney's use of *723 the term "recommendation" during voir dire did not impermissibly lessen the jury's responsibility.