DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 708 So. 2d 703.

119 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Lonnie Paul Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Comeaux 82 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 39 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Ruffin 82 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Green 84 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Moton 73 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Williams 69 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert, denied.
  • State v. Jones 51 So. 3d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; Clark, supra; State v. Ricard, 98-2278, 99-0424 (La.App.
  • State v. Foster 44 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Robertson , 11408 — 297 at 12-13, 995 So.2d at 659 -60 (citing State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Barbour 35 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
  • State v. Jackson 11 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, *533 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    See State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Robertson 995 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    |13 State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Camper 996 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 96-0123, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    State v. Williams , XXXX-XXXX, p. 18 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Woodfork 981 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
    State v. Wessinger, 98-1234, pp. 27-28 (La.5/14/99) (prosecutor's reference to jury's penalty phase decision as recommendation did not mislead jury as to finality of decision to impose death sentence when jury was properly informed of seriousness and finality of their decision by prosecutor and trial judge); State v. Williams, 96-1023 p. 26 (La.1/21/98), (court rejected similar argument that the court lessened the juror's sense of responsibility by using the word recommendation in describing the
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
    See also State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1998), -726 (evidence demonstrating that the defendant shot a man during a robbery just hours before the crime charged was admissible in a first-degree murder prosecution because evidence of the earlier shooting was relevant to show that the defendant intended to fire the gun *125 at the victim even though he claimed tha
  • State v. Rose 949 So. 2d 1236 La. 2007
    art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
  • State v. Stukes 944 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Riley 941 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Trackling 930 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, pp. 32-33 (La.1/21/98), (State's assertion that juror appeared "weak, scary and shaky on the death penalty" accepted as race-neutral reason).
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    See, e.g., State v. Wessinger, supra ; State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), ; State v. Brumfield, 96-2667 (La.10/28/98), ; State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; State v. Craig, 95-2499 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Taylor, supra ; State v. Scales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Allen 913 So. 2d 788 La. 2005
    See State v. Smith, 793 So.2d at 1209 (citing State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ).
  • State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 17 (La.1/21/98), ("[A]n instruction equating reasonable doubt with `a serious doubt for which you could give a good reason' [is] not constitutionally infirm.") (citing Smith, 91-0749 at 2, 637 So.2d at 399 ); see also State v. Brumfield, 96-2667, p. 47 (La.10/28/98), -85 (citing Smith ).
  • State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 17 (La.1/21/98), (“[A]n instruction equating reasonable doubt with ‘a serious doubt for which you could give a good reason’ [is] not constitutionally infirm.”) (citing Smith, 91-0749 at 2, 637 So.2d at 399 ); see also State v. Brumfield, 96-2667, p. 47 (La.10/28/98), -85 (citing Smith).
  • State ex rel. Williams v. State 888 So. 2d 792 La. 2004
    State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , reh’g denied (La.2/20/98).
  • State v. Alexander 871 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    at 1724, n. 21 ; State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Williams 866 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Anthony 862 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    art. 905.2(A) regarding who may give victim impact testimony); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 6 (La.1/21/98), ; Cross at p. 7 , 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson at p. 4 , 630 So.2d at 1281 ; Ross, 623 So.2d at 644
  • State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
    10/19/99), ; State v. Brumfield, 96-2667 (La.10/20/98), ; State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), ; State v. Scales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Craig, 95-2499 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Gaddis 839 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    641 , 130 L.Ed.2d 546 (1994) and State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
    For example, in State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1998), -726 , evidence defendant committed a robbery which involved a gun, just hours before the crime charged, was held admissible in a first degree murder prosecution.
  • State v. Clark 828 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; Ricard; supra.
  • State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
    [15] State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), -723 .
  • State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
    [7] In fact, the prosecutor's exercise of a peremptory strike as to Richardson was race-neutral, State v. Williams, 96-1023, pp. 32-33 (La.1/21/98), (state's assertion that juror appeared "weak, scary and shaky on the death penalty" accepted as race-neutral), and it was accepted by the trial judge.
  • State v. Irish 807 So. 2d 208 La. 2002
    1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999) (Broadway's co-defendant); State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Royal 807 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    1769, 1770-1771 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995); State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Jacobs 803 So. 2d 933 La. 2001
    1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 ; State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Smith 793 So. 2d 1199 La. 2001
    This Court addressed the issue of whether a police officer is able give testimony concerning a defendant's prior conviction during the penalty phase of a trial in State v. Williams, 96-1023, pp. 19-21 (La.1/21/98), -20 .
  • State v. Johnson 775 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 13 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Palmer 775 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    P. art. 774; State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 13 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
    State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    [but] the judge is free, *560 based upon all the information presented and that judge's eyewitness observation of counsel, to conclude that the reason is offered in good faith and not as a subterfuge for race."); State v. Williams, 96-1023, pp. 32-33 (La.1/21/98), (State's assertion that juror appeared "weak, scary, and shaky on the death penalty" accepted as race-neutral reason when considered in the context of body language, etc.); State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 8 (La.11/25/96), -75 (noting impor