DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Major, 708 So. 2d 813.

105 citing documents.

  • State v. CASSIMERE 34 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819 this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Wiltz 28 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , that “[t]he articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.” 06-0875 at p. 18, at 820 .
  • State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Moss 17 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Bell 16 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Fields 10 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Ambeau 6 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , an appellate court should not vacate a sentence simply because a trial court has not followed La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. George 4 So. 3d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical [ ¡[Compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Major 1 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Robinson 996 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Kelly 986 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Jarreau 982 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : *880 The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Dunbar 981 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not *54 rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Gauthier 978 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jones 975 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Smith 974 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Martin 970 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , that "[t]he articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions."
  • State v. Hollins 964 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Thomas 954 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), : The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Robert 931 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Couvillion 910 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , the court determined a 30-year sentence was not excessive for a principal to the crime of manslaughter.
  • State v. Bajoie 899 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Bertrand 891 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Landry 871 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , 819 this court stated: *1240 The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Loston 874 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4th Cir.3/4/98), -819 , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), .
  • State v. Lebreton 859 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , and certiorari denied 537 U.S. 839 , 123 S.Ct.
  • State v. Simmons 848 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Smith 842 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    App. 4 Cir. 3/4/98), , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Coleman 828 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this Court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Coston 800 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this Court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Harris 787 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Robichaux 788 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Algere 780 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir.3/4/98), , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), .
  • State v. Pleasant 772 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , (court affirmed thirty year sentences for manslaughter for each of two defendants who shot their victim with an assault rifle after getting into an argument in a nightclub, and then pursued him after he had driven away).
  • State v. Hall 775 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.
  • State v. Guy 775 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-2171 (La.1/15/99), , this court stated: The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.