Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lucky, 755 So. 2d 845.

52 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Johnny E. Jefferson Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
4/13/99), State v. Conklin, 18-0718, p. 12 (La.App.
State v. Conklin 274 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lynn Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Jones 254 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Lynn 251 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Raine 238 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/13/99), , 857 (quoting Williamson , 512 U.S. at 600 -601 , 114 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
4/13/99), (appendix); State v. Sanders, 93-0001 at p. 20, 648 So.2d at 1288 .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
4/13/99), this court discussed admissibility of an accomplice’s statement.
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
4/13/99), -49, wherein the challenged juror stated that he would consider mitigating evidence, but would require that evidence to be substantial before he would consider recommending a life sentence.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 7 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), ; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State in the Interest of J.E. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), cert.
State ex rel. J.E.T. 10 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State Ex Rel. Jet 10 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
State v. Higgins, 03-1980, pp. 30-31 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, pp. 7-8 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
Id., citing State v. Lucky , XXXX-XXXX p. 7 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State Ex Rel. Ab 983 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State ex rel. A.B. 983 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
4/13/99), ("[T]he trial judge perceived [the juror's] responses to mean that his predisposition toward the death penalty, balanced with a willingness to consider mitigating circumstances and to credit those that he deemed `pretty heavy,' did not significantly impair [the juror's] performance of his duties as a juror in acc
State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Lucky, 96-1687 p. 7-8 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
In State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , this court approved the denial of a cause challenge when a juror stated that he would consider mitigating evidence, but would require substantial evidence in mitigation in order to be inclined to recommend a life sentence.
State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
State v. Lucky, 96-1687 p. 7-8 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Reed 924 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
1196 , 149 L.Ed.2d 111 (2001) (prospective jurors who expressly agree to consider both life and death sentences and to consider any mitigating evidence are not properly excused for cause); State v. Lucky , 96-1687, p. 6 (4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Johnson 917 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Williams 918 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 16 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
Tate , 01-1658 at 18, 851 So.2d at 936 ; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. McGee 894 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 16 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. McLelland 860 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 16 (La.4/13/99), , reh'g denied, (La.9/17/99), , cert.
State v. Barton 857 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
1887, 1901 , 144 L.Ed.2d 117 (1999); State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Terrick 857 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
Explained State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
As we explained in State v. Lucky, 96-1687, pp. 7-8 (La.4/13/99), , 851: When the trial judge throughout the voir dire demonstrates an awareness of the proper legal standard, and when there is nothing in the record of the voir dire that, taken as a whole, shows a substantial impairment of the prospective juror, a reviewing court should defer to the trial judge's determination with r
State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999); State v. Lucky, 96-1687 at p. 22 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Marshall 812 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
Applied to the instant jurors, this Court's reasoning from State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , is instructive: When the trial judge throughout the voir dire demonstrates an awareness of the proper legal standard, and when there is nothing in the record of the voir dire that, taken as a whole, shows a substantial impairment of the prospective juror, a reviewing court should defer to the trial judge's determina
State v. Hutchinson 803 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See Carter, 664 So.2d at 385 ; State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Williams 804 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 16 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Neal 796 So. 2d 649 La. 2001
2352 , 141 L.Ed.2d 722 (1998) (defendant employed a "hitman" to kill his wife and her friend); State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Ledet 792 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Jacobs 789 So. 2d 1280 La. 2001
776 So.2d at 405 -06 (citing State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), ).
State v. Gibson 785 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
See State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
In State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), , this court approved the denial of a cause challenge when a juror stated that he would consider mitigating evidence, but would require substantial evidence in mitigation in order to be inclined to recommend a life sentence.
State v. Taylor 781 So. 2d 1205 La. 2001
State v. Lucky, 96-1687 p. 6 (La.4/13/99), .