Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 715 So. 2d 547.

20 citing documents.

State v. Lewis 126 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lockett 120 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Carter 112 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , 549: |fiIn order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the “plain view” exception to the Fourth Amendment, “(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where it is immediately apparent without
State v. Bridges 104 So. 3d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Davis 859 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Dowell 857 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this Court discussed the plain view exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the “plain view” exception to the Fourth Amendment, “(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (
State v. Jones 822 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this Court discussed the plain view exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the “plain view” exception to the Fourth Amendment, “(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area;.
State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this court discussed the plain view exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the “plain view” exception to the Fourth Amendment, “(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (
State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , 549: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the “plain view” exception to the Fourth Amendment, “(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where it is immediately apparent without clo
State v. Frank 804 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this court discussed the plain view exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the “plain view” exception to the Fourth Amendment, “(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (
State v. Camese 786 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Dorsey 779 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this court discussed the plain view exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the "plain view" exception to the Fourth Amendment, "(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (
State v. Wyatt 775 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this court discussed this exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the "plain view" exception to the Fourth Amendment, "(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where i
State v. Aicklen 767 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Allen 762 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir.6/3/98), , this court discussed the exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the “plain view” exception to the Fourth Amendment, “(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where it
State v. Robinson 743 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 6/3/98) , , this Court discussed this exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the “plain view” exception to the Fourth Amendment, “(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where i
State v. Oliver 752 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this court discussed this exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the "plain view" exception to the Fourth Amendment, "(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where i
State v. Harris 744 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this court discussed this exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the "plain view" exception to the Fourth Amendment, "(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where i
State v. Martin 738 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Brown 733 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 6/3/98), , this court discussed this exception: In order for an object to be lawfully seized pursuant to the "plain view" exception to the Fourth Amendment, "(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where i