Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Byrd, 708 So. 2d 401.

81 citing documents.

State v. Carter 88 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
And the last time I checked the possession of bunk is not a crime.” The Louisiana Supreme Court explained the purpose and limits of a motion to quash in State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , stating: |SA motion to quash is, essentially, a mechanism whereby pre-trial pleas are urged, i.e., pleas which do not go to the merits of the charge.
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Charles Barfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Barfield 81 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
ms raised via a motion to quash as “pleas which do not go to the merits of the charge,” and as “procedural matters” wherein “the question of factual guilt or innocence is not before the court.” Accordingly, allegations by the defendants that are, in reality, defenses on the merits to the state’s charge are “not proper grounds for a motion to quash.” State v. Byrd, 96-2302, pp. 18-20 (La.3/13/98), -12 , cert.
State v. Dillard 55 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Fox 43 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Byrd, 96-2302, pp. 18-19, (La.3/13/98), (emphasis added).
Kozlowicz v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 9 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert denied, 525 U.S. 876 , 19 S.Ct.
State v. Armstard 991 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
P. art. 531-534; State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Trevino 985 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
NOTES [1] State v. Byrd, 1996-2302 (La.3/13/98), ; See also, State v. Mulvihill, 03-691 (La.App.
State v. Carter 974 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In our denial, we cited State v. Byrd, 96-2302, pp. 18-19 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Michael Gordon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Lauff 953 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Rivers 942 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In State v. Byrd, 96-2302, pp. 18-19 (La.3/13/98), , the Supreme Court discussed a motion to quash based on Article 485: A motion to quash is, essentially, a mechanism whereby pre-trial pleas are urged, i.e., pleas which do not go to the merits of the charge.
State v. Corbett 888 So. 2d 764 La. 2004
s previously held that “[i]n considering a motion to quash, a court must accept as true the facts contained in *766 the bills of information and in the bill of particulars, and determine as a matter of law and from the face of the pleadings, whether a crime has been charged; while evidence may be adduced, such may not include a defense on the merits.” State v. Byrd, 96-2302 p. 18-19 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Corbett 879 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Byrd, 1996-2302, p. 18 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Billard 852 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. White 811 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Hampton 811 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Stewart 811 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Nichols 772 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Byrd, 96-2302, p. 18 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[12] See also, State v. Byrd, 96-2302, pp. 11-13 (La.3/13/98), -409 , cert.
State v. Lowry 762 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
Frederick v. Ieyoub 762 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.03/13/98), .
State v. Boudreaux 756 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Moten 748 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Martin 763 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Byrd, 96-2302, p. 18 *8 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Dean 748 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 4/27/99) ; citing State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98); .
State v. Pertuit 734 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Norfleet 721 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Const., Art. I, §§ 2,13; State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), , cert.
State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Const., Art. I, §§ 2,13; State v. Byrd, 96-2302 (La.3/13/98), .