DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Broadway, 753 So. 2d 801.

186 citing documents.

  • State v. Greco 862 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1173, 1177 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959); State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 17 (La.10/19/99)
  • State v. Hills 866 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    NOTES [1] State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 22 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Turner 859 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
    10/19/99), ; State v. Brumfield, 96-2667 (La.10/20/98), ; State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), ; State v. Scales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Craig, 95-2499 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Hebert 846 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Jones 841 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Broadway, 96-2659, pp. 8-9 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Antoine 841 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
    589 , 145 L.Ed.2d 489 (1999)(defendant shot and killed two people, and injured two people during the course of an armed robbery); State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Rodriguez 839 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), -807, 810 , cert.
  • State v. Weber 834 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the criteria for admissibility of identification evidence at trial: The defendant has the burden of proof on a motion to suppress out-of-court identification.
  • State v. Doleman 835 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    1173, 1177 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959); State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 17 (La.10/19/99)
  • State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Randall 830 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 24 (La.10/19/98), , 817 citing Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 , 106 S.Ct.
  • Explained State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
    [22] In State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 24 (La.10/19/99) , 817 we explained: Confrontation errors are subject to a harmless error analysis.
  • State v. Cowart 815 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    In addition, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Sewell 811 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Smith 809 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 12 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Johnson 812 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [7] 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 24 (La.10/19/99), .
  • State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
    589 , 145 L.Ed.2d 489 (1999) (defendant shot and killed two people, and injured two people during the course of an armed robbery); State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 27 (La.10/19/99), ; Brumfield, 737 So.2d at 671, n. 6.
  • State v. Irish 807 So. 2d 208 La. 2002
    589 , 145 L.Ed.2d 489 (1999) (defendant shot and killed two people, and injured two people during the course of an armed robbery); State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Loper 807 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    art. 703D; State v. Broadway, 96-2659, (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Bagneris 804 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    art. 801(C) defines hearsay as “as statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the present trial or hearing, offered into evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” See State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), .
  • State v. Goldston 804 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.3/15/00), , citing State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Graham 799 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Jacobs 803 So. 2d 933 La. 2001
    589 , 145 L.Ed.2d 489 (1999); State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Davis 786 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , the defendant similarly contended that a witness should not have been allowed to testify at trial, because the state and the court allegedly knew that the witness was going to perjure himself.
  • State v. Howard 786 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , the defendant similarly contended that a witness should not have been allowed to testify at trial, because the state and the court allegedly knew that the witness was going to perjure himself.
  • State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
    1173, 1177 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959); State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 17 (La.10/19/99)
  • State v. Asberry 808 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 24 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/16/00) , ; State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Williams 769 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 23 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
    589 , 145 L.Ed.2d 489 (1999) (defendant shot and killed two people, and injured two people during the course of an armed robbery); State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), , cert.
  • State v. Debrow 763 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    See State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), .
  • State v. Rodriguez 753 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 14 (La.10/19/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The defendant has the burden of proof on a motion to suppress an out-of-court identification.