DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jiron, 683 So. 2d 769.

16 citing documents.

  • State v. Joseph 817 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Cazenave 772 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5th Cir. 10/1/96), ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Lewis 764 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    *172 App. 5th Cir. 10/1/96), ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Webber 742 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir. 10/1/96) , ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Touissant 734 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    App. 5th Cir. 10/1/96), ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Hopson 735 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Lewis 732 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir.10/1/96), ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Vasquez 729 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Barnes 729 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Cedrington 725 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Lewis 720 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    5 Cir. 10/1/96) , ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Gaines 707 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • Explained State v. Fazande 707 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    5th Cir. 10/1/96), , 771 we explained: The duty of the appellate court in reviewing an Anders appeal is to determine whether there are any nonfrivolous issues which arguably support the appeal.
  • State v. Rose 708 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Batiste 708 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Nash 694 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    5th Cir. 10/1/96) , 771: The duty of the appellate court in reviewing an Anders appeal [sis to determine whether there are any nonfrivolous issues which arguably support the appeal.