Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kelly, 704 So. 2d 800.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Pettus 96 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 11/12/97), -08 , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), .
  • State v. Jackson 889 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 11/12/97) , -808 , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), .
  • State v. Peyrefitte 885 So. 2d 530 La. 2004
    5th Cir.11/12/97), , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), (same).
  • State v. Bartley 871 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 11/12/97) , -808 , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), .
  • State v. Smith 864 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 11/12/97) , -808 , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), .
  • State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5th Cir.11/12/97), , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), , this Court noted that the article tracks Rule 806 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
  • State v. Stevenson 817 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 11/12/97) , -808 , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), .
  • State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 11/12/97) , -808 , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), ; State v. Wilson, 96-251 (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 778 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir.11/12/97), , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), .
  • State v. Short 769 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir.11/12/97), -808 , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), .
  • State v. Cordero 738 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5th Cir. 11/12/97), -808 , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), ; State v. Wilson, 96-251 (La.App.
  • State v. Anthony 735 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir. 11/12/97) , , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), .
  • State v. Brockel 733 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir. 11/12/97) , , writ denied, 97-3104 (La.4/9/98), ; State v. Wilson, 96-251 (La.App.
  • State v. Kennerson 715 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    App. 5 Cir. 11/12/97); ; recently held, with the same fact pattern and defense making the same argument, defendant was not entitled to a continuance.